opencode vs fixzi-mcp — Trust Score Comparison

Side-by-side trust comparison of opencode and fixzi-mcp. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

opencode scores 82.5/100 (A) while fixzi-mcp scores 67.5/100 (B-) on the Nerq Trust Score. opencode leads by 15.0 points. opencode is a coding tool with 108,137 stars, Nerq Verified. fixzi-mcp is a uncategorized tool with 0 stars.
82.5
A verified
Categorycoding
Stars108,137
Sourcegithub
Security1
Compliance100
Maintenance1
Documentation1
vs
67.5
B-
Categoryuncategorized
Stars0
Sourcemcp_registry

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric opencode fixzi-mcp
Trust Score82.5/10067.5/100
GradeAB-
Stars108,1370
Categorycodinguncategorized
Security1N/A
Compliance100N/A
Maintenance1N/A
Documentation1N/A
EU AI Act RiskN/AN/A
VerifiedYesNo

Verdict

opencode leads with a trust score of 82.5/100 compared to fixzi-mcp's 67.5/100 (a 15.0-point difference). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

Security scores measure dependency vulnerabilities, CVE exposure, and security practices. opencode scores 1 and fixzi-mcp scores N/A on this dimension.

Maintenance & Activity

Activity scores reflect how actively each project is maintained. opencode: 1, fixzi-mcp: N/A.

Documentation

Documentation quality is evaluated based on README, API docs, and example coverage. opencode: 1, fixzi-mcp: N/A.

Community & Adoption

opencode has 108,137 GitHub stars while fixzi-mcp has 0. opencode has significantly broader community adoption, which typically means more Stack Overflow answers, more third-party tutorials, and faster ecosystem development.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose opencode if you need:

  • Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
  • Stronger security profile with fewer known vulnerabilities
  • More actively maintained with faster release cadence
  • Larger community (108,137 vs 0 stars)
  • Better documentation for faster onboarding

Choose fixzi-mcp if you need:

  • Consider if it better fits your specific use case

Switching from opencode to fixzi-mcp (or vice versa)

When migrating between opencode and fixzi-mcp, consider these factors:

  1. API Compatibility: opencode (coding) and fixzi-mcp (uncategorized) serve different categories, so migration may require significant refactoring.
  2. Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the opencode safety report and fixzi-mcp safety report for known issues.
  3. Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
  4. Community Support: opencode has 108,137 stars and fixzi-mcp has 0. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
opencode Safety Report fixzi-mcp Safety Report opencode Alternatives fixzi-mcp Alternatives

Related Pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, opencode or fixzi-mcp?
Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, opencode has a trust score of 82.5/100 (A) while fixzi-mcp scores 67.5/100 (B-). The 15.0-point difference suggests opencode has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.
How do opencode and fixzi-mcp compare on security?
opencode has a security score of 1/100 and fixzi-mcp scores N/A/100. There is a notable difference in their security assessments. opencode's compliance score is 100/100 (EU risk: N/A), while fixzi-mcp's is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A).
Should I use opencode or fixzi-mcp?
The choice depends on your requirements. opencode (coding, 108,137 stars) and fixzi-mcp (uncategorized, 0 stars) serve different use cases. On trust, opencode scores 82.5/100 and fixzi-mcp scores 67.5/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (1 vs N/A), and maintenance activity (1 vs N/A).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-08-03 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy