Open-Assistant vs openclaw-supermemory — Trust Score Comparison
Side-by-side trust comparison of Open-Assistant and openclaw-supermemory. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.
Detailed Metric Comparison
| Metric | Open-Assistant | openclaw-supermemory |
|---|---|---|
| Trust Score | 67.9/100 | 70.9/100 |
| Grade | B- | B |
| Stars | 37,449 | 0 |
| Category | communication | ai_assistant |
| Security | 0 | 0 |
| Compliance | 73 | 96 |
| Maintenance | 1 | 1 |
| Documentation | 0 | 1 |
| EU AI Act Risk | minimal | minimal |
| Verified | No | Yes |
Verdict
openclaw-supermemory leads with a trust score of 70.9/100 compared to Open-Assistant's 67.9/100 (a 3.0-point difference). openclaw-supermemory scores higher on compliance (96 vs 73). However, Open-Assistant has stronger community adoption (37,449 vs 0 stars). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.
Detailed Analysis
Security
Open-Assistant leads on security with a score of 0/100 compared to openclaw-supermemory's 0/100. This score reflects dependency vulnerability analysis, known CVE exposure, and security best practices. A higher security score means fewer known vulnerabilities and better security hygiene in the codebase.
Maintenance & Activity
Open-Assistant demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (1/100 vs 1/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.
Documentation
openclaw-supermemory has better documentation (1/100 vs 0/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.
Community & Adoption
Open-Assistant has 37,449 GitHub stars while openclaw-supermemory has 0. Open-Assistant has significantly broader community adoption, which typically means more Stack Overflow answers, more third-party tutorials, and faster ecosystem development.
When to Choose Each Tool
Choose Open-Assistant if you need:
- More actively maintained with faster release cadence
- Larger community (37,449 vs 0 stars)
Choose openclaw-supermemory if you need:
- Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
- Better documentation for faster onboarding
Switching from Open-Assistant to openclaw-supermemory (or vice versa)
When migrating between Open-Assistant and openclaw-supermemory, consider these factors:
- API Compatibility: Open-Assistant (communication) and openclaw-supermemory (ai_assistant) serve different categories, so migration may require significant refactoring.
- Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the Open-Assistant safety report and openclaw-supermemory safety report for known issues.
- Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
- Community Support: Open-Assistant has 37,449 stars and openclaw-supermemory has 0. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
Related Pages
Frequently Asked Questions
Related Comparisons
Last updated: 2026-08-08 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.