next-devtools-mcp vs graph-schema-utils — Trust Score Comparison

Side-by-side trust comparison of next-devtools-mcp and graph-schema-utils. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

next-devtools-mcp scores 67.0/100 (C) while graph-schema-utils scores 58.6/100 (D) on the Nerq Trust Score. next-devtools-mcp leads by 8.4 points. next-devtools-mcp is a devops tool with 589 stars. graph-schema-utils is a uncategorized tool with 0 stars.
67.0
C
Categorydevops
Stars589
Sourcemcp
Security0
Compliance100
Maintenance0
Documentation0
vs
58.6
D
Categoryuncategorized
Stars0
Sourcenpm_full
Compliance100

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric next-devtools-mcp graph-schema-utils
Trust Score67.0/10058.6/100
GradeCD
Stars5890
Categorydevopsuncategorized
Security0N/A
Compliance100100
Maintenance0N/A
Documentation0N/A
EU AI Act RiskminimalN/A
VerifiedNoNo

Verdict

next-devtools-mcp leads with a trust score of 67.0/100 compared to graph-schema-utils's 58.6/100 (a 8.4-point difference). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

Security scores measure dependency vulnerabilities, CVE exposure, and security practices. next-devtools-mcp scores 0 and graph-schema-utils scores N/A on this dimension.

Maintenance & Activity

Activity scores reflect how actively each project is maintained. next-devtools-mcp: 0, graph-schema-utils: N/A.

Documentation

Documentation quality is evaluated based on README, API docs, and example coverage. next-devtools-mcp: 0, graph-schema-utils: N/A.

Community & Adoption

next-devtools-mcp has 589 GitHub stars while graph-schema-utils has 0. next-devtools-mcp has significantly broader community adoption, which typically means more Stack Overflow answers, more third-party tutorials, and faster ecosystem development.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose next-devtools-mcp if you need:

  • Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
  • More actively maintained with faster release cadence
  • Larger community (589 vs 0 stars)

Choose graph-schema-utils if you need:

  • Consider if it better fits your specific use case

Switching from next-devtools-mcp to graph-schema-utils (or vice versa)

When migrating between next-devtools-mcp and graph-schema-utils, consider these factors:

  1. API Compatibility: next-devtools-mcp (devops) and graph-schema-utils (uncategorized) serve different categories, so migration may require significant refactoring.
  2. Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the next-devtools-mcp safety report and graph-schema-utils safety report for known issues.
  3. Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
  4. Community Support: next-devtools-mcp has 589 stars and graph-schema-utils has 0. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
next-devtools-mcp Safety Report graph-schema-utils Safety Report next-devtools-mcp Alternatives graph-schema-utils Alternatives

Related Pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, next-devtools-mcp or graph-schema-utils?
Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, next-devtools-mcp has a trust score of 67.0/100 (C) while graph-schema-utils scores 58.6/100 (D). The 8.4-point difference suggests next-devtools-mcp has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.
How do next-devtools-mcp and graph-schema-utils compare on security?
next-devtools-mcp has a security score of 0/100 and graph-schema-utils scores N/A/100. There is a notable difference in their security assessments. next-devtools-mcp's compliance score is 100/100 (EU risk: minimal), while graph-schema-utils's is 100/100 (EU risk: N/A).
Should I use next-devtools-mcp or graph-schema-utils?
The choice depends on your requirements. next-devtools-mcp (devops, 589 stars) and graph-schema-utils (uncategorized, 0 stars) serve different use cases. On trust, next-devtools-mcp scores 67.0/100 and graph-schema-utils scores 58.6/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (0 vs N/A), and maintenance activity (0 vs N/A).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-06-22 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy