gcloud-mcp vs runningAgent — Trust Score Comparison
Side-by-side trust comparison of gcloud-mcp and runningAgent. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.
Detailed Metric Comparison
| Metric | gcloud-mcp | runningAgent |
|---|---|---|
| Trust Score | 81.2/100 | 70.3/100 |
| Grade | D | B |
| Stars | 0 | 0 |
| Category | infrastructure | health |
| Security | 1 | 0 |
| Compliance | 87 | 100 |
| Maintenance | 1 | 1 |
| Documentation | 1 | 1 |
| EU AI Act Risk | minimal | minimal |
| Verified | Yes | Yes |
Verdict
gcloud-mcp leads with a trust score of 81.2/100 compared to runningAgent's 70.3/100 (a 10.9-point difference). gcloud-mcp scores higher on security (1 vs 0). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.
Detailed Analysis
Security
gcloud-mcp leads on security with a score of 1/100 compared to runningAgent's 0/100. This score reflects dependency vulnerability analysis, known CVE exposure, and security best practices. A higher security score means fewer known vulnerabilities and better security hygiene in the codebase.
Maintenance & Activity
gcloud-mcp demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (1/100 vs 1/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.
Documentation
gcloud-mcp has better documentation (1/100 vs 1/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.
Community & Adoption
gcloud-mcp has 0 GitHub stars while runningAgent has 0. Both tools have comparable community sizes, suggesting similar levels of ecosystem support and third-party resources.
When to Choose Each Tool
Choose gcloud-mcp if you need:
- Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
- Stronger security profile with fewer known vulnerabilities
Choose runningAgent if you need:
- Consider if it better fits your specific use case
Switching from gcloud-mcp to runningAgent (or vice versa)
When migrating between gcloud-mcp and runningAgent, consider these factors:
- API Compatibility: gcloud-mcp (infrastructure) and runningAgent (health) serve different categories, so migration may require significant refactoring.
- Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the gcloud-mcp safety report and runningAgent safety report for known issues.
- Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
- Community Support: gcloud-mcp has 0 stars and runningAgent has 0. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
Related Pages
Frequently Asked Questions
Related Comparisons
Last updated: 2026-06-21 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.