Is Openclaw Channel Dingtalk Safe?
Openclaw Channel Dingtalk — Nerq Trust Score 72.7/100 (B grade). Based on analysis of 5 trust dimensions, it is generally safe but has some concerns. Last updated: 2026-05-02.
Yes, Openclaw Channel Dingtalk is safe to use. Openclaw Channel Dingtalk is a software tool with a Nerq Trust Score of 72.7/100 (B), based on 5 independent data dimensions. Recommended for use. Security: 1/100. Maintenance: 1/100. Popularity: 1/100. Data sourced from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Last updated: 2026-05-02. Machine-readable data (JSON).
Is Openclaw Channel Dingtalk safe?
YES — Openclaw Channel Dingtalk has a Nerq Trust Score of 72.7/100 (B). It meets Nerq's trust threshold with strong signals across security, maintenance, and community adoption. Recommended for use — review the full report below for specific considerations.
What is Openclaw Channel Dingtalk's trust score?
Openclaw Channel Dingtalk has a Nerq Trust Score of 72.7/100, earning a B grade. This score is based on 5 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.
What are the key security findings for Openclaw Channel Dingtalk?
Openclaw Channel Dingtalk's strongest signal is compliance at 96/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected. It meets the Nerq Verified threshold of 70+.
What is Openclaw Channel Dingtalk and who maintains it?
| Author | soimy |
| Category | Communication |
| Stars | 469 |
| Source | https://github.com/soimy/openclaw-channel-dingtalk |
| Protocols | rest · websocket |
Regulatory Compliance
| EU AI Act Risk Class | Not assessed |
| Compliance Score | 96/100 |
| Jurisdictions | Assessed across 52 jurisdictions |
Popular Alternatives in communication
Openclaw Channel Dingtalk Across Platforms
Same developer/company in other registries:
What Is Openclaw Channel Dingtalk?
Openclaw Channel Dingtalk is a software tool in the communication category: A DingTalk bot channel plugin for Clawdbot, enabling various communication features and AI interactions.. It has 469 GitHub stars. Nerq Trust Score: 73/100 (B).
Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including security vulnerabilities, maintenance activity, license compliance, and community adoption.
How Nerq Assesses Openclaw Channel Dingtalk's Safety
Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensions. Here is how Openclaw Channel Dingtalk performs in each:
- Security (1/100): Openclaw Channel Dingtalk's security posture is poor. This score factors in known CVEs, dependency vulnerabilities, security policy presence, and code signing practices.
- Maintenance (1/100): Openclaw Channel Dingtalk is potentially abandoned. We track commit frequency, release cadence, issue response times, and PR merge rates.
- Documentation (1/100): Documentation quality is insufficient. This includes README completeness, API documentation, usage examples, and contribution guidelines.
- Compliance (96/100): Openclaw Channel Dingtalk is broadly compliant. Assessed against regulations in 52 jurisdictions including the EU AI Act, CCPA, and GDPR.
- Community (1/100): Community adoption is limited. Based on GitHub stars, forks, download counts, and ecosystem integrations.
The overall Trust Score of 72.7/100 (B) reflects the weighted combination of these signals. This exceeds the Nerq Verified threshold of 70, indicating the tool meets our standards for production use.
Who Should Use Openclaw Channel Dingtalk?
Openclaw Channel Dingtalk is designed for:
- Developers and teams working with communication tools
- Organizations evaluating AI tools for their stack
- Researchers exploring AI capabilities in this domain
Risk guidance: Openclaw Channel Dingtalk meets the minimum threshold for production use, but we recommend monitoring for security advisories and keeping dependencies up to date. Consider implementing additional guardrails for sensitive workloads.
How to Verify Openclaw Channel Dingtalk's Safety Yourself
While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:
- Check the source code — Review the repository's security policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active maintenance.
- Scan dependencies — Use tools like
npm audit,pip-audit, orsnykto check for known vulnerabilities in Openclaw Channel Dingtalk's dependency tree. - Review permissions — Understand what access Openclaw Channel Dingtalk requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
- Test in isolation — Run Openclaw Channel Dingtalk in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
- Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks:
GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=openclaw-channel-dingtalk - Review the license — Confirm that Openclaw Channel Dingtalk's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
- Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses security concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.
Common Safety Concerns with Openclaw Channel Dingtalk
When evaluating whether Openclaw Channel Dingtalk is safe, consider these category-specific risks:
Understand how Openclaw Channel Dingtalk processes, stores, and transmits your data. Review the tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.
Check Openclaw Channel Dingtalk's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher security risk.
Regularly check for updates to Openclaw Channel Dingtalk. Security patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.
If Openclaw Channel Dingtalk connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.
Verify that Openclaw Channel Dingtalk's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Openclaw Channel Dingtalk in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.
Best Practices for Using Openclaw Channel Dingtalk Safely
Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Openclaw Channel Dingtalk while minimizing risk:
Periodically review how Openclaw Channel Dingtalk is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and compliance with your security policies.
Ensure Openclaw Channel Dingtalk and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from security patches.
Grant Openclaw Channel Dingtalk only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.
Subscribe to Openclaw Channel Dingtalk's security advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.
Create and maintain a clear policy for how Openclaw Channel Dingtalk is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.
When Should You Avoid Openclaw Channel Dingtalk?
Even well-trusted tools aren't right for every situation. Consider avoiding Openclaw Channel Dingtalk in these scenarios:
- Scenarios where Openclaw Channel Dingtalk's specific capabilities exceed your actual needs — simpler tools may be safer
- Air-gapped environments where the tool cannot receive security updates
- Projects with strict regulatory requirements that haven't been explicitly validated
For each scenario, evaluate whether Openclaw Channel Dingtalk's trust score of 72.7/100 meets your organization's risk tolerance. The Nerq Verified status indicates general production readiness, but sector-specific requirements may apply.
How Openclaw Channel Dingtalk Compares to Industry Standards
Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among communication tools, the average Trust Score is 62/100. Openclaw Channel Dingtalk's score of 72.7/100 is significantly above the category average of 62/100.
This places Openclaw Channel Dingtalk in the top tier of communication tools that Nerq tracks. Tools scoring this far above average typically demonstrate mature security practices, consistent release cadence, and broad community adoption.
Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks moderate in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.
Trust Score History
Nerq continuously monitors Openclaw Channel Dingtalk and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or maintenance patterns change, Openclaw Channel Dingtalk's score is updated within 24 hours.
Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to security and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced maintenance, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Openclaw Channel Dingtalk's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=openclaw-channel-dingtalk&include=history
Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — security, maintenance, documentation, compliance, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Openclaw Channel Dingtalk are strengthening or weakening over time.
Openclaw Channel Dingtalk vs Alternatives
In the communication category, Openclaw Channel Dingtalk scores 72.7/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:
- Openclaw Channel Dingtalk vs Real-Time-Voice-Cloning — Trust Score: 71.3/100
- Openclaw Channel Dingtalk vs ChatGPT — Trust Score: 58.8/100
- Openclaw Channel Dingtalk vs jan — Trust Score: 58.8/100
Key Takeaways
- Openclaw Channel Dingtalk has a Trust Score of 72.7/100 (B) and is Nerq Verified.
- Openclaw Channel Dingtalk meets the minimum threshold for production deployment, though monitoring and additional guardrails are recommended.
- Among communication tools, Openclaw Channel Dingtalk scores significantly above the category average of 62/100, demonstrating above-average reliability.
- Always verify safety independently — use Nerq's Preflight API for automated, up-to-date trust checks before integration.
Detailed Score Analysis
| Dimension | Score |
|---|---|
| Security | 1/100 |
| Maintenance | 1/100 |
| Popularity | 1/100 |
Based on 3 dimensions. Data from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard.
What data does Openclaw Channel Dingtalk collect?
Privacy assessment for Openclaw Channel Dingtalk is not yet available. See our methodology for how Nerq measures privacy, or the public privacy review for any community-contributed notes.
Is Openclaw Channel Dingtalk secure?
Security score: 1/100. Review security practices and consider alternatives with higher security scores for sensitive use cases.
Nerq monitors this entity against NVD, OSV.dev, and registry-specific vulnerability databases for ongoing security assessment.
Full analysis: Openclaw Channel Dingtalk Security Report
Openclaw Channel Dingtalk Across Platforms
Same developer/company in other registries:
How we calculated this score
Openclaw Channel Dingtalk's trust score of 72.7/100 (B) is computed from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. The score reflects 3 independent dimensions: security (1/100), maintenance (1/100), popularity (1/100). Each dimension is weighted equally to produce the composite trust score.
Nerq analyzes over 7.5 million entities across 26 registries using the same methodology, enabling direct cross-entity comparison. Scores are updated continuously as new data becomes available.
This page was last reviewed on May 02, 2026. Data version: 1.0.
Full methodology documentation · Machine-readable data (JSON API)
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Openclaw Channel Dingtalk Safe?
What is Openclaw Channel Dingtalk's trust score?
What are safer alternatives to Openclaw Channel Dingtalk?
How often is Openclaw Channel Dingtalk's safety score updated?
Can I use Openclaw Channel Dingtalk in a regulated environment?
See Also
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.