BloomBee vs stable-hash — Trust Score Comparison

Side-by-side trust comparison of BloomBee and stable-hash. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

BloomBee scores 69.9/100 (C) while stable-hash scores 56.8/100 (D) on the Nerq Trust Score. BloomBee leads by 13.1 points. BloomBee is a coding tool with 108 stars. stable-hash is a uncategorized tool with 0 stars.

bloom — Nerq Trust Score 72.5/100 (B). httpx — Nerq Trust Score 80.8/100 (A-). httpx leads by 8.3 points.

69.9
C
Categorycoding
Stars108
Sourcegithub
Security0
Compliance92
Maintenance1
Documentation0
vs
56.8
D
Categoryuncategorized
Stars0
Sourcenpm_full
Compliance100

Detailed Score Analysis

Dimensionbloomhttpx
Security90/10090/100
Maintenance100/100100/100
Popularity45/100100/100
Quality65/10065/100
Community35/10035/100

Five-dimension Nerq trust breakdown (registries: pypi / pypi). Scored equally weighted across security, maintenance, popularity, quality, community.

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric BloomBee stable-hash
Trust Score69.9/10056.8/100
GradeCD
Stars1080
Categorycodinguncategorized
Security0N/A
Compliance92100
Maintenance1N/A
Documentation0N/A
EU AI Act RiskminimalN/A
VerifiedNoNo

Verdict

BloomBee leads with a trust score of 69.9/100 compared to stable-hash's 56.8/100 (a 13.1-point difference). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

Security scores measure dependency vulnerabilities, CVE exposure, and security practices. BloomBee scores 0 and stable-hash scores N/A on this dimension.

Maintenance & Activity

Activity scores reflect how actively each project is maintained. BloomBee: 1, stable-hash: N/A.

Documentation

Documentation quality is evaluated based on README, API docs, and example coverage. BloomBee: 0, stable-hash: N/A.

Community & Adoption

BloomBee has 108 GitHub stars while stable-hash has 0. BloomBee has significantly broader community adoption, which typically means more Stack Overflow answers, more third-party tutorials, and faster ecosystem development.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose BloomBee if you need:

  • Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
  • More actively maintained with faster release cadence
  • Larger community (108 vs 0 stars)

Choose stable-hash if you need:

  • Consider if it better fits your specific use case

Switching from BloomBee to stable-hash (or vice versa)

When migrating between BloomBee and stable-hash, consider these factors:

  1. API Compatibility: BloomBee (coding) and stable-hash (uncategorized) serve different categories, so migration may require significant refactoring.
  2. Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the BloomBee safety report and stable-hash safety report for known issues.
  3. Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
  4. Community Support: BloomBee has 108 stars and stable-hash has 0. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
BloomBee Safety Report stable-hash Safety Report BloomBee Alternatives stable-hash Alternatives

Related Pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, BloomBee or stable-hash?
Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, BloomBee has a trust score of 69.9/100 (C) while stable-hash scores 56.8/100 (D). The 13.1-point difference suggests BloomBee has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.
How do BloomBee and stable-hash compare on security?
BloomBee has a security score of 0/100 and stable-hash scores N/A/100. There is a notable difference in their security assessments. BloomBee's compliance score is 92/100 (EU risk: minimal), while stable-hash's is 100/100 (EU risk: N/A).
Should I use BloomBee or stable-hash?
The choice depends on your requirements. BloomBee (coding, 108 stars) and stable-hash (uncategorized, 0 stars) serve different use cases. On trust, BloomBee scores 69.9/100 and stable-hash scores 56.8/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (0 vs N/A), and maintenance activity (1 vs N/A).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-05-09 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy