Is Astra 32B Thinking V1 I1 Gguf Safe?

Astra 32B Thinking V1 I1 Gguf — Nerq Trust Score 54.4/100 (D grade). Based on analysis of 1 trust dimensions, it is has notable safety concerns. Last updated: 2026-05-09.

Use Astra 32B Thinking V1 I1 Gguf with some caution. Astra 32B Thinking V1 I1 Gguf is a software tool with a Nerq Trust Score of 54.4/100 (D), based on 3 independent data dimensions. Below the recommended threshold of 70. Data sourced from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Last updated: 2026-05-09. Machine-readable data (JSON).

Is Astra 32B Thinking V1 I1 Gguf safe?

CAUTION — Astra 32B Thinking V1 I1 Gguf has a Nerq Trust Score of 54.4/100 (D). It has moderate trust signals but shows some areas of concern that warrant attention. Suitable for development use — review security and maintenance signals before production deployment.

Security Analysis → Astra 32B Thinking V1 I1 Gguf Privacy Report →

What is Astra 32B Thinking V1 I1 Gguf's trust score?

Astra 32B Thinking V1 I1 Gguf has a Nerq Trust Score of 54.4/100, earning a D grade. This score is based on 1 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.

Compliance
87

What are the key security findings for Astra 32B Thinking V1 I1 Gguf?

Astra 32B Thinking V1 I1 Gguf's strongest signal is compliance at 87/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected. It has not yet reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70+.

Compliance: 87/100 — covers 45 of 52 jurisdictions

What is Astra 32B Thinking V1 I1 Gguf and who maintains it?

Authormradermacher
CategoryUncategorized
Sourcehttps://huggingface.co/mradermacher/ASTRA-32B-Thinking-v1-i1-GGUF
Protocolshuggingface_hub

Regulatory Compliance

EU AI Act Risk ClassNot assessed
Compliance Score87/100
JurisdictionsAssessed across 52 jurisdictions

What Is Astra 32B Thinking V1 I1 Gguf?

Astra 32B Thinking V1 I1 Gguf is a software tool in the uncategorized category available on huggingface_full. Nerq Trust Score: 54/100 (D).

Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including security vulnerabilities, maintenance activity, license compliance, and community adoption.

How Nerq Assesses Astra 32B Thinking V1 I1 Gguf's Safety

Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensions. Here is how Astra 32B Thinking V1 I1 Gguf performs in each:

The overall Trust Score of 54.4/100 (D) reflects the weighted combination of these signals. This is below the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. We recommend additional due diligence before production deployment.

Who Should Use Astra 32B Thinking V1 I1 Gguf?

Astra 32B Thinking V1 I1 Gguf is designed for:

Risk guidance: Astra 32B Thinking V1 I1 Gguf is suitable for development and testing environments. Before production deployment, conduct a thorough review of its security posture, review the specific trust signals above, and consider whether a higher-scored alternative meets your requirements.

How to Verify Astra 32B Thinking V1 I1 Gguf's Safety Yourself

While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:

  1. Check the source code — Review the repository security policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active maintenance.
  2. Scan dependencies — Use tools like npm audit, pip-audit, or snyk to check for known vulnerabilities in Astra 32B Thinking V1 I1 Gguf's dependency tree.
  3. Review permissions — Understand what access Astra 32B Thinking V1 I1 Gguf requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
  4. Test in isolation — Run Astra 32B Thinking V1 I1 Gguf in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
  5. Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=ASTRA-32B-Thinking-v1-i1-GGUF
  6. Review the license — Confirm that Astra 32B Thinking V1 I1 Gguf's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
  7. Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses security concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.

Common Safety Concerns with Astra 32B Thinking V1 I1 Gguf

When evaluating whether Astra 32B Thinking V1 I1 Gguf is safe, consider these category-specific risks:

Data handling

Understand how Astra 32B Thinking V1 I1 Gguf processes, stores, and transmits your data. Review the tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.

Dependency security

Check Astra 32B Thinking V1 I1 Gguf's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher security risk.

Update frequency

Regularly check for updates to Astra 32B Thinking V1 I1 Gguf. Security patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.

Third-party integrations

If Astra 32B Thinking V1 I1 Gguf connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.

License and IP compliance

Verify that Astra 32B Thinking V1 I1 Gguf's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Astra 32B Thinking V1 I1 Gguf in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.

Best Practices for Using Astra 32B Thinking V1 I1 Gguf Safely

Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Astra 32B Thinking V1 I1 Gguf while minimizing risk:

Conduct regular audits

Periodically review how Astra 32B Thinking V1 I1 Gguf is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and compliance with your security policies.

Keep dependencies updated

Ensure Astra 32B Thinking V1 I1 Gguf and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from security patches.

Follow least privilege

Grant Astra 32B Thinking V1 I1 Gguf only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.

Monitor for security advisories

Subscribe to Astra 32B Thinking V1 I1 Gguf's security advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.

Document usage policies

Create and maintain a clear policy for how Astra 32B Thinking V1 I1 Gguf is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.

When Should You Avoid Astra 32B Thinking V1 I1 Gguf?

Even promising tools aren't right for every situation. Consider avoiding Astra 32B Thinking V1 I1 Gguf in these scenarios:

For each scenario, evaluate whether Astra 32B Thinking V1 I1 Gguf's trust score of 54.4/100 meets your organization's risk tolerance. We recommend running a manual security assessment alongside the automated Nerq score.

How Astra 32B Thinking V1 I1 Gguf Compares to Industry Standards

Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among uncategorized tools, the average Trust Score is 62/100. Astra 32B Thinking V1 I1 Gguf's score of 54.4/100 is near the category average of 62/100.

This places Astra 32B Thinking V1 I1 Gguf in line with the typical uncategorized tool tool. It meets baseline expectations but does not distinguish itself from peers on trust metrics.

Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks moderate in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.

Trust Score History

Nerq continuously monitors Astra 32B Thinking V1 I1 Gguf and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or maintenance patterns change, Astra 32B Thinking V1 I1 Gguf's score is updated within 24 hours.

Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to security and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced maintenance, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Astra 32B Thinking V1 I1 Gguf's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=ASTRA-32B-Thinking-v1-i1-GGUF&include=history

Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — security, maintenance, documentation, compliance, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Astra 32B Thinking V1 I1 Gguf are strengthening or weakening over time.

Key Takeaways

What data does Astra 32B Thinking V1 I1 Gguf collect?

Privacy assessment for Astra 32B Thinking V1 I1 Gguf is not yet available. See our methodology for how Nerq measures privacy, or the public privacy review for any community-contributed notes.

Is Astra 32B Thinking V1 I1 Gguf secure?

Security score: under assessment. Review security practices and consider alternatives with higher security scores for sensitive use cases.

Nerq monitors this entity against NVD, OSV.dev, and registry-specific vulnerability databases for ongoing security assessment.

Full analysis: Astra 32B Thinking V1 I1 Gguf Security Report

How we calculated this score

Astra 32B Thinking V1 I1 Gguf's trust score of 54.4/100 (D) is computed from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. The score reflects 0 independent dimensions: . Each dimension is weighted equally to produce the composite trust score.

Nerq analyzes over 7.5 million entities across 26 registries using the same methodology, enabling direct cross-entity comparison. Scores are updated continuously as new data becomes available.

This page was last reviewed on May 09, 2026. Data version: 1.0.

Full methodology documentation · Machine-readable data (JSON API)

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Astra 32B Thinking V1 I1 Gguf Safe?
Use with some caution. ASTRA-32B-Thinking-v1-i1-GGUF with a Nerq Trust Score of 54.4/100 (D). Strongest signal: compliance (87/100). Score based on multiple trust dimensions.
What is Astra 32B Thinking V1 I1 Gguf's trust score?
ASTRA-32B-Thinking-v1-i1-GGUF: 54.4/100 (D). Score based on multiple trust dimensions. Compliance: 87/100. Scores update as new data becomes available. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=ASTRA-32B-Thinking-v1-i1-GGUF
What are safer alternatives to Astra 32B Thinking V1 I1 Gguf?
In the Uncategorized category, more software tools are being analyzed — check back soon. ASTRA-32B-Thinking-v1-i1-GGUF scores 54.4/100.
How often is Astra 32B Thinking V1 I1 Gguf's safety score updated?
Nerq continuously monitors Astra 32B Thinking V1 I1 Gguf and updates its trust score as new data becomes available. Current: 54.4/100 (D), last verified 2026-05-09. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=ASTRA-32B-Thinking-v1-i1-GGUF
Can I use Astra 32B Thinking V1 I1 Gguf in a regulated environment?
Astra 32B Thinking V1 I1 Gguf has not reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. Additional due diligence is recommended.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

See Also

Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy