anubis vs calver — Trust Score Comparison

Name: anubis vs calver Trust Comparison
Creator: Nerq

Side-by-side trust comparison of anubis and calver. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

anubis scores 66.9/100 (C) while calver scores 59.2/100 (D) on the Nerq Trust Score. anubis leads by 7.7 points. anubis is a security tool with 17,082 stars. calver is a uncategorized tool with 0 stars.

anubis

66.9

Categorysecurity

Stars17,082

Sourcegithub

Security0

Compliance97

Maintenance1

Documentation0

calver

59.2

Categoryuncategorized

Stars0

Sourcenpm_full

Compliance100

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric	anubis	calver
Trust Score	66.9/100	59.2/100
Grade	C	D
Stars	17,082	0
Category	security	uncategorized
Security	0	N/A
Compliance	97	100
Maintenance	1	N/A
Documentation	0	N/A
EU AI Act Risk	minimal	N/A
Verified	No	No

Verdict

anubis leads with a trust score of 66.9/100 compared to calver's 59.2/100 (a 7.7-point difference). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

Security scores measure dependency vulnerabilities, CVE exposure, and security practices. anubis scores 0 and calver scores N/A on this dimension.

Maintenance & Activity

Activity scores reflect how actively each project is maintained. anubis: 1, calver: N/A.

Documentation

Documentation quality is evaluated based on README, API docs, and example coverage. anubis: 0, calver: N/A.

Community & Adoption

anubis has 17,082 GitHub stars while calver has 0. anubis has significantly broader community adoption, which typically means more Stack Overflow answers, more third-party tutorials, and faster ecosystem development.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose anubis if you need:

Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
More actively maintained with faster release cadence
Larger community (17,082 vs 0 stars)

Choose calver if you need:

Consider if it better fits your specific use case

Switching from anubis to calver (or vice versa)

When migrating between anubis and calver, consider these factors:

API Compatibility: anubis (security) and calver (uncategorized) serve different categories, so migration may require significant refactoring.
Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the anubis safety report and calver safety report for known issues.
Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
Community Support: anubis has 17,082 stars and calver has 0. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.

anubis Safety Report calver Safety Report anubis Alternatives calver Alternatives

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, anubis or calver?

Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, anubis has a trust score of 66.9/100 (C) while calver scores 59.2/100 (D). The 7.7-point difference suggests anubis has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.

How do anubis and calver compare on security?

anubis has a security score of 0/100 and calver scores N/A/100. There is a notable difference in their security assessments. anubis's compliance score is 97/100 (EU risk: minimal), while calver's is 100/100 (EU risk: N/A).

Should I use anubis or calver?

The choice depends on your requirements. anubis (security, 17,082 stars) and calver (uncategorized, 0 stars) serve different use cases. On trust, anubis scores 66.9/100 and calver scores 59.2/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (0 vs N/A), and maintenance activity (1 vs N/A).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-08-05 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.