agentscan vs wan2-1-fast-security — Trust Score Comparison

Side-by-side trust comparison of agentscan and wan2-1-fast-security. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

agentscan scores 74.0/100 (B) while wan2-1-fast-security scores 57.2/100 (D) on the Nerq Trust Score. agentscan leads by 16.8 points. agentscan is a security agent with 0 stars, Nerq Verified. wan2-1-fast-security is a security agent with 319 stars.
74.0
B verified
Categorysecurity
Stars0
Sourcegithub
Security0
Compliance97
Maintenance1
Documentation1
vs
57.2
D
Categorysecurity
Stars319
Sourcehuggingface_space_v2
Compliance77
Maintenance0
Documentation0

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric agentscan wan2-1-fast-security
Trust Score74.0/10057.2/100
GradeBD
Stars0319
Categorysecuritysecurity
Security0N/A
Compliance9777
Maintenance10
Documentation10
EU AI Act Riskminimalminimal
VerifiedYesNo

Verdict

agentscan leads with a trust score of 74.0/100 compared to wan2-1-fast-security's 57.2/100 (a 16.8-point difference). agentscan scores higher on compliance (97 vs 77), maintenance (1 vs 0). However, wan2-1-fast-security has stronger community adoption (319 vs 0 stars). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

Security scores measure dependency vulnerabilities, CVE exposure, and security practices. agentscan scores 0 and wan2-1-fast-security scores N/A on this dimension.

Maintenance & Activity

agentscan demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (1/100 vs 0/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.

Documentation

agentscan has better documentation (1/100 vs 0/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.

Community & Adoption

agentscan has 0 GitHub stars while wan2-1-fast-security has 319. wan2-1-fast-security has significantly broader community adoption, which typically means more Stack Overflow answers, more third-party tutorials, and faster ecosystem development.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose agentscan if you need:

  • Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
  • More actively maintained with faster release cadence
  • Better documentation for faster onboarding

Choose wan2-1-fast-security if you need:

  • Larger community (319 vs 0 stars)

Switching from agentscan to wan2-1-fast-security (or vice versa)

When migrating between agentscan and wan2-1-fast-security, consider these factors:

  1. API Compatibility: agentscan (security) and wan2-1-fast-security (security) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
  2. Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the agentscan safety report and wan2-1-fast-security safety report for known issues.
  3. Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
  4. Community Support: agentscan has 0 stars and wan2-1-fast-security has 319. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
agentscan Safety Report wan2-1-fast-security Safety Report agentscan Alternatives wan2-1-fast-security Alternatives

Related Pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, agentscan or wan2-1-fast-security?
Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, agentscan has a trust score of 74.0/100 (B) while wan2-1-fast-security scores 57.2/100 (D). The 16.8-point difference suggests agentscan has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.
How do agentscan and wan2-1-fast-security compare on security?
agentscan has a security score of 0/100 and wan2-1-fast-security scores N/A/100. There is a notable difference in their security assessments. agentscan's compliance score is 97/100 (EU risk: minimal), while wan2-1-fast-security's is 77/100 (EU risk: minimal).
Should I use agentscan or wan2-1-fast-security?
The choice depends on your requirements. agentscan (security, 0 stars) and wan2-1-fast-security (security, 319 stars) serve similar use cases. On trust, agentscan scores 74.0/100 and wan2-1-fast-security scores 57.2/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (1 vs 0), and maintenance activity (1 vs 0).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-05-09 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy