Is Agents Safe? — Trust Score: 88.7/100

According to Nerq's independent analysis of wshobson/agents, this devops has a trust score of 88.7 out of 100, earning a A grade. With 29,146 stars on github, it is recommended for production use. Security score: 1/100. Compliance: 100/100 across 52 jurisdictions. Data sourced from 13+ independent signals including GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Last updated: 2026-03-19. Machine-readable data (JSON).

wshobson/agents has a Nerq Trust Score of 88.7/100 (A). Recommended — meets Nerq Verified threshold. Its strongest signal is compliance (100/100). Compliance: 52 of 52 jurisdictions. Last verified: 2026-03-19.

Is Agents safe?

YES — Agents has a Nerq Trust Score of 88.7/100 (A). It meets Nerq's trust threshold with strong signals across security, maintenance, and community adoption. Recommended for production use — review the full report below for specific considerations.

88.7
out of 100
A devops github verified

Trust Assessment

Highly Trusted — wshobson/agents ranks among the top AI agents with exceptional trust signals across security, maintenance, and ecosystem metrics. It has been independently assessed by Nerq and demonstrates consistently strong quality indicators.

Trust Signal Breakdown

Security
1
Code quality, vulnerability exposure, and security practices.
Compliance
100
Regulatory alignment. EU AI Act risk class: N/A.
Maintenance
1
Update frequency, issue responsiveness, active development.
Documentation
1
README quality, API docs, usage examples.
Popularity
1
Community adoption. 29,146 stars on github.

Details

Authorwshobson
Categorydevops
Stars29,146
Sourcehttps://github.com/wshobson/agents
Frameworksanthropic
Protocolsrest

Regulatory Compliance

EU AI Act Risk ClassNot assessed
Compliance Score100/100
JurisdictionsAssessed across 52 jurisdictions

Popular Alternatives in devops

ansible/ansible
84.3/100 · A
github
FlowiseAI/Flowise
78.1/100 · B
github
continuedev/continue
85.6/100 · A
github
nrwl/nx
87.1/100 · A
github
PrefectHQ/fastmcp
88.3/100 · A
github

Community Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to review wshobson/agents.

What Is Agents?

Agents is a AI tool for DevOps, infrastructure, and deployment automation. Intelligent automation and multi-agent orchestration for Claude Code

As of March 2026, Agents has 29,146 stars on github, making it one of the most popular tools in its category in the AI ecosystem. But popularity alone does not equal safety — which is why Nerq independently analyzes every tool across 13+ trust signals.

How Nerq Assesses Agents's Safety

Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensions. Here is how Agents performs in each:

The overall Trust Score of 88.7/100 (A) reflects the weighted combination of these signals. This exceeds the Nerq Verified threshold of 70, indicating the tool meets our standards for production use.

Who Should Use Agents?

Agents is designed for:

Risk guidance: Agents is well-suited for production environments. Its high trust score indicates robust security, active maintenance, and strong community support. Standard security practices (dependency pinning, access controls, monitoring) are still recommended.

How to Verify Agents's Safety Yourself

While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any AI tool:

  1. Check the source code — Review the repository's security policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active maintenance.
  2. Scan dependencies — Use tools like npm audit, pip-audit, or snyk to check for known vulnerabilities in Agents's dependency tree.
  3. Review permissions — Understand what access Agents requires. AI tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
  4. Test in isolation — Run Agents in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
  5. Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=wshobson/agents
  6. Review the license — Confirm that Agents's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
  7. Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses security concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.

Common Safety Concerns with Agents

When evaluating whether Agents is safe, consider these category-specific risks:

Data handling

Understand how Agents processes, stores, and transmits your data. Review the tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.

Dependency security

Check Agents's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher security risk.

Update frequency

Regularly check for updates to Agents. Security patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.

Third-party integrations

If Agents connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.

License and IP compliance

Verify that Agents's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Agents in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.

Best Practices for Using Agents Safely

Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Agents while minimizing risk:

Conduct regular audits

Periodically review how Agents is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and compliance with your security policies.

Keep dependencies updated

Ensure Agents and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from security patches.

Follow least privilege

Grant Agents only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.

Monitor for security advisories

Subscribe to Agents's security advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.

Document usage policies

Create and maintain a clear policy for how Agents is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.

When Should You Avoid Agents?

Even well-trusted tools aren't right for every situation. Consider avoiding Agents in these scenarios:

For each scenario, evaluate whether Agents's trust score of 88.7/100 meets your organization's risk tolerance. The Nerq Verified status indicates general production readiness, but sector-specific requirements may apply.

How Agents Compares to Industry Standards

Nerq indexes over 204,000 AI agents and tools across dozens of categories. Among DevOps tools, the average Trust Score is 63/100. Agents's score of 88.7/100 is significantly above the category average of 63/100.

This places Agents in the top tier of DevOps tools that Nerq tracks. Tools scoring this far above average typically demonstrate mature security practices, consistent release cadence, and broad community adoption.

Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks moderate in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.

Trust Score History

Nerq continuously monitors Agents and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or maintenance patterns change, Agents's score is updated within 24 hours.

Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to security and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced maintenance, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Agents's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=wshobson/agents&include=history

Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — security, maintenance, documentation, compliance, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Agents are strengthening or weakening over time.

Agents vs Alternatives

In the devops category, Agents scores 88.7/100. It ranks among the top tools in its category. For a detailed comparison, see:

Key Takeaways

Frequently Asked Questions

Is wshobson/agents safe to use?
wshobson/agents has a Nerq Trust Score of 88.7/100, earning a A grade. Highly Trusted — wshobson/agents ranks among the top AI agents with exceptional trust signals across security, maintenance, and ecosystem metrics. It has been independently assessed by Nerq and demonstrates consistently strong quality indicators. Its strongest signal is compliance (100/100). It is Nerq Verified, meaning it meets the 70+ trust threshold. Always review the full KYA report before using any AI agent in production.
What is wshobson/agents's trust score?
Nerq assigns wshobson/agents a trust score of 88.7 out of 100, with a grade of A. This score is computed from multiple dimensions including security, compliance, maintenance activity, documentation quality, and community adoption (29,146 stars). Compliance score: 100/100. Scores are updated daily based on the latest publicly available signals.
Are there safer alternatives to wshobson/agents?
In the devops category, higher-rated alternatives include ansible/ansible, FlowiseAI/Flowise, continuedev/continue (scores: 84, 78, 86). wshobson/agents scores 88.7/100. When choosing between agents, consider your specific requirements for security (1), maintenance activity (1), and documentation (1). Use Nerq's comparison tools or the KYA endpoint for detailed side-by-side analysis.
How often is Agents's safety score updated?
Nerq continuously monitors Agents and updates its trust score as new data becomes available. The system ingests signals from 13+ independent sources including GitHub, NVD (National Vulnerability Database), OSV.dev, OpenSSF Scorecard, and major package registries (npm, PyPI). When a new CVE is disclosed, a dependency is updated, or commit activity changes, the score adjusts automatically. For the most current score, query the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=wshobson/agents. The current assessment (88.7/100, A) was last verified on 2026-03-19.
Can I use Agents in a regulated environment?
Yes — Agents meets the Nerq Verified threshold (70+), indicating it has passed automated trust checks across security, compliance, and maintenance dimensions. Nerq assesses compliance across 52 jurisdictions. Agents has a compliance score of 100/100. For organizations in regulated industries (healthcare, finance, government), we recommend combining the Nerq Trust Score with your internal security review process, vendor risk assessment, and legal compliance check before deployment.

Add This Badge to YOUR Project

Nerq Trust Score for wshobson/agents

Show users your project is trusted. Add this badge to your README:

[![Nerq Trust Score](https://nerq.ai/badge/wshobson/agents)](https://nerq.ai/safe/wshobson-agents)

Click to copy. Works on GitHub, GitLab, and any markdown renderer.

Scan your project
pip install nerq && nerq scan

Scans all dependencies for trust scores and security issues.

Integrate trust checks
curl nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=wshobson-agents
API docs →
Improve this score
See recommendations →
Verify any agent
Browse devops
All agents · MCP servers · Compare · Gateway

Related Safety Checks

Is Cursor safe? Is ChatGPT safe? Is Claude safe? Is Windsurf safe? Is Bolt safe? Is Cline safe? Is GitHub Copilot safe? Is Gemini safe? Is Ollama safe? Is LangChain safe? Is OpenAI safe? Is n8n safe? Is ComfyUI safe? Is CrewAI safe? Is AutoGPT safe? Is Devin safe? Is Continue safe? Is LlamaIndex safe? Is Hugging Face safe? Is Stable Diffusion safe?

Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

Also explore

Nerq Trust Protocol AI Compliance Hub Know Your Agent Crypto Vitality Rankings Crash Watch: Live Alerts Real-Time Token Scanner