Is Telerik.Fonticons Safe?

Telerik.Fonticons — Nerq Trust Score 48.2/100 (D grade). Based on analysis of 2 trust dimensions, it is has notable safety concerns. Last updated: 2026-06-22.

Exercise caution with Telerik.Fonticons. Telerik.Fonticons is a NuGet package with a Nerq Trust Score of 48.2/100 (D), based on 3 independent data dimensions. Below the recommended threshold of 70. Security: 90/100. Popularity: 0/100. Data sourced from nuget.org, GitHub, and NVD. Last updated: 2026-03-20. Machine-readable data (JSON).

Is Telerik.Fonticons safe?

NO — USE WITH CAUTION — Telerik.Fonticons has a Nerq Trust Score of 48.2/100 (D). It has below-average trust signals with significant gaps in security, maintenance, or documentation. Not recommended for production use without thorough manual review and additional security measures.

Security Analysis → Telerik.Fonticons Privacy Report →

What is Telerik.Fonticons's trust score?

Telerik.Fonticons has a Nerq Trust Score of 48.2/100, earning a D grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.

Security
90
Popularity
0

What are the key security findings for Telerik.Fonticons?

Telerik.Fonticons's strongest signal is security at 90/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected. It has not yet reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70+.

Security score: 90/100 (strong)
Popularity: 0/100 — community adoption

What is Telerik.Fonticons and who maintains it?

AuthorProgress
CategoryNuGet Packages
SourceN/A

Telerik.Fonticons Across Platforms

Same developer/company in other registries:

@progress/kendo-angular-schematics
78/100 · npm
@progress/kendo-react-popup
78/100 · npm
@progress/kendo-react-labels
76/100 · npm
@progress/kendo-angular-popup
76/100 · npm
@progress/kendo-dateinputs-common
76/100 · npm

Similar Nuget by Trust Score

Accord.Neuro (58)AathifMahir.Maui.MauiIcons.Core (58)Aardvark.Rendering.Vulkan (58)2AxisTechnology.Core.CL (58)Aardvark.Base.Tensors (58)
See all safest Nuget →

Compare

Telerik.Fonticons vs Accord.NeuroTelerik.Fonticons vs AathifMahir.Maui.MauiIcons.CoreTelerik.Fonticons vs Aardvark.Rendering.Vulkan

Safety Guide: Telerik.Fonticons

What is Telerik.Fonticons?

Telerik.Fonticons is a NuGet package — Font icons for Telerik UI..

How to Verify Safety

Run dotnet list package --vulnerable. Check publisher on nuget.org.

You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=Telerik.FontIcons

Key Safety Concerns for NuGet package

When evaluating any NuGet package, watch for: dependency vulnerabilities, publisher verification.

Trust Assessment

Telerik.Fonticons has a Nerq Trust Score of 48/100 (D) and has not yet reached Nerq trust threshold (70+). This score is based on automated analysis of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.

Key Takeaways

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Telerik.Fonticons Safe?
Exercise caution. Telerik.FontIcons with a Nerq Trust Score of 48.2/100 (D). Strongest signal: security (90/100). Score based on Security (90/100), Popularity (0/100).
What is Telerik.Fonticons's trust score?
Telerik.FontIcons: 48.2/100 (D). Score based on Security (90/100), Popularity (0/100). Scores update as new data becomes available. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=Telerik.FontIcons
What are safer alternatives to Telerik.Fonticons?
In the NuGet Packages category, more NuGet packages are being analyzed — check back soon. Telerik.FontIcons scores 48.2/100.
Does Telerik.Fonticons have known vulnerabilities?
Nerq checks Telerik.Fonticons against NVD, OSV.dev, and registry-specific vulnerability databases. Current security score: 90/100. Run your package manager's audit command for the latest findings.
Is Telerik.Fonticons's publisher verified?
Telerik.Fonticons has not reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. Additional due diligence is recommended.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

See Also

Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy