Is Dapper.Mapper Safe?
Use Dapper.Mapper with some caution. Dapper.Mapper is a NuGet package ('var employee = connection) with a Nerq Trust Score of 53.2/100 (C-), based on 3 independent data dimensions. It is below the recommended threshold of 70. Security: 90/100. Popularity: 0/100. Data sourced from nuget.org, GitHub, and NVD. Last updated: 2026-03-29. Machine-readable data (JSON).
Is Dapper.Mapper safe?
CAUTION — Dapper.Mapper has a Nerq Trust Score of 53.2/100 (C-). It has moderate trust signals but shows some areas of concern that warrant attention. Suitable for development use — review security and maintenance signals before production deployment.
Trust Score Breakdown
Key Findings
Details
| Author | Arjen Post |
| Category | nuget |
| Source | N/A |
Safety Guide: Dapper.Mapper
What is Dapper.Mapper?
Dapper.Mapper is a NuGet package — Dapper.Mapper is an extension to Dapper multi mapping which figures out the relationships between the returned objects and automatically assigns them. Instead of explicitly writing this: 'var employee.
How to Verify Safety
Run dotnet list package --vulnerable. Check publisher on nuget.org.
You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=Dapper.Mapper
Key Safety Concerns for NuGet packages
When evaluating any NuGet package, watch for: dependency vulnerabilities, publisher verification.
Trust Assessment
Dapper.Mapper has a Nerq Trust Score of 53/100 (C-) and has not yet reached Nerq trust threshold (70+). This score is based on automated analysis of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.
Key Takeaways
- Dapper.Mapper has a Trust Score of 53/100 (C-).
- Review carefully before use — below trust threshold.
- Always verify independently using the Nerq API.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Dapper.Mapper safe to use?
What is Dapper.Mapper's trust score?
What are safer alternatives to Dapper.Mapper?
Does Dapper.Mapper have known vulnerabilities?
Is Dapper.Mapper's publisher verified?
Popular in nuget
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.