.ai-summary{background:#f9fafb;border-left:3px solid #0d9488;padding:16px 20px;margin:16px 0;font-size:15px;line-height:1.7;color:#374151} .score-hero{text-align:center;padding:32px 16px;border:1px solid #e5e7eb;margin:16px 0} .score-hero .big-score{font-family:ui-monospace,'SF Mono',monospace;font-size:3.5rem;font-weight:700;color:#0d9488;line-height:1} .score-hero .score-sub{font-size:14px;color:#6b7280;margin:4px 0 12px} .badges{display:flex;gap:8px;justify-content:center;flex-wrap:wrap} .signals-grid{display:grid;grid-template-columns:repeat(auto-fit,minmax(200px,1fr));gap:12px;margin:16px 0} .signal-card{border:1px solid #e5e7eb;padding:16px} .signal-card .sig-name{font-size:12px;color:#6b7280;font-weight:600;text-transform:uppercase;letter-spacing:0.03em;margin-bottom:4px} .signal-card .sig-val{font-family:ui-monospace,'SF Mono',monospace;font-size:1.5rem;font-weight:700;color:#1a1a1a} .signal-card .sig-desc{font-size:13px;color:#6b7280;margin-top:6px} .caps-list{list-style:none;padding:0;margin:12px 0} .caps-list li{padding:6px 0;border-bottom:1px solid #f3f4f6;font-size:14px} .caps-list li::before{content:"→ ";color:#0d9488;font-weight:700} .alt-grid{display:grid;grid-template-columns:repeat(auto-fit,minmax(200px,1fr));gap:12px;margin:16px 0} .alt-card{border:1px solid #e5e7eb;padding:16px;text-decoration:none;color:inherit;transition:border-color 0.2s} .alt-card:hover{border-color:#0d9488;text-decoration:none} .alt-card .alt-name{font-weight:700;font-size:15px;color:#1a1a1a;margin-bottom:4px} .alt-card .alt-score{font-family:ui-monospace,'SF Mono',monospace;font-size:13px;color:#0d9488} .alt-card .alt-cat{font-size:12px;color:#6b7280} .faq-section{margin:24px 0} .faq-item{border-bottom:1px solid #e5e7eb;padding:16px 0} .faq-item:first-child{border-top:1px solid #e5e7eb} .faq-q{font-weight:700;font-size:1rem;color:#1a1a1a;margin-bottom:8px} .faq-a{font-size:15px;color:#374151;line-height:1.7} .badge-embed{background:#f5f5f5;padding:16px;margin:12px 0} .badge-embed pre{user-select:all;cursor:pointer;font-size:12px;margin:8px 0 0}

Is AIGC-Hackers/mcpx MCP Server Safe? Trust Score: 62.8/100

Independent trust assessment for the AIGC-Hackers/mcpx MCP server. Category: infrastructure. Source: github.

AIGC-Hackers/mcpx is an MCP server with a Nerq Trust Score of 62.8/100 (C). Ranked #602 of 31252 MCP servers on Nerq. Not yet Nerq Verified (requires 70+). Its strongest signal is compliance (100/100). Last verified: 2026-04-28.
62.8
out of 100 — Nerq MCP Server Trust Score
C MCP Server infrastructure

Trust Assessment

Moderate — AIGC-Hackers/mcpx shows mixed trust signals. Some areas are strong while others could be improved. Review the full KYA report before integrating into production.

Trust Signal Breakdown

Security
0
Code quality, vulnerability exposure, and security practices.
Compliance
100
Regulatory alignment. EU AI Act risk class: minimal.
Maintenance
1
Update frequency, issue responsiveness, active development.
Documentation
0
README quality, API docs, usage examples.
Popularity
0
Community adoption. 18 stars on github.

Details

AuthorUnknown
Categoryinfrastructure
Stars18
Sourcehttps://github.com/AIGC-Hackers/mcpx
ProtocolMCP (Model Context Protocol)
Popularity#602 of 31252 MCP servers

Higher-Rated MCP Servers in infrastructure

Frequently Asked Questions

Is AIGC-Hackers/mcpx MCP server safe to use?
AIGC-Hackers/mcpx has a Nerq Trust Score of 62.8/100, earning a C grade. Moderate — AIGC-Hackers/mcpx shows mixed trust signals. Some areas are strong while others could be improved. Review the full KYA report before integrating into production. Its strongest signal is compliance (100/100). It has not yet reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. Always review the full KYA report before integrating any MCP server into production.
What is AIGC-Hackers/mcpx's trust score?
Nerq assigns AIGC-Hackers/mcpx a trust score of 62.8 out of 100, with a grade of C. This score is computed from security, compliance, maintenance activity, documentation quality, and community adoption (18 stars). Compliance score: 100/100. EU AI Act risk class: minimal. Scores are updated daily based on the latest publicly available signals.
Are there higher-rated alternatives to AIGC-Hackers/mcpx?
In the infrastructure category, higher-rated MCP servers include auth0/auth0-mcp-server, gcloud-mcp, strava-mcp (scores: 85, 81, 80). AIGC-Hackers/mcpx scores 62.8/100. When choosing between MCP servers, consider security (0), maintenance (1), and documentation (0). Use Nerq's KYA endpoint for detailed analysis.

Badge Embed

Nerq Trust Score for AIGC-Hackers/mcpx

Add this trust badge to your README:

[![Nerq Trust Score](https://nerq.ai/badge/AIGC-Hackers/mcpx)](https://nerq.ai/mcp/mcpx)
Check MCP server trust
Full KYA report for AIGC-Hackers/mcpx · Preflight API
Explore MCP ecosystem
All MCP servers · Agent safety · Compare
API docs · Trust Oracle

Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence before integrating any MCP server.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy