.ai-summary{background:#f9fafb;border-left:3px solid #0d9488;padding:16px 20px;margin:16px 0;font-size:15px;line-height:1.7;color:#374151} .score-hero{text-align:center;padding:32px 16px;border:1px solid #e5e7eb;margin:16px 0} .score-hero .big-score{font-family:ui-monospace,'SF Mono',monospace;font-size:3.5rem;font-weight:700;color:#0d9488;line-height:1} .score-hero .score-sub{font-size:14px;color:#6b7280;margin:4px 0 12px} .badges{display:flex;gap:8px;justify-content:center;flex-wrap:wrap} .signals-grid{display:grid;grid-template-columns:repeat(auto-fit,minmax(200px,1fr));gap:12px;margin:16px 0} .signal-card{border:1px solid #e5e7eb;padding:16px} .signal-card .sig-name{font-size:12px;color:#6b7280;font-weight:600;text-transform:uppercase;letter-spacing:0.03em;margin-bottom:4px} .signal-card .sig-val{font-family:ui-monospace,'SF Mono',monospace;font-size:1.5rem;font-weight:700;color:#1a1a1a} .signal-card .sig-desc{font-size:13px;color:#6b7280;margin-top:6px} .caps-list{list-style:none;padding:0;margin:12px 0} .caps-list li{padding:6px 0;border-bottom:1px solid #f3f4f6;font-size:14px} .caps-list li::before{content:"→ ";color:#0d9488;font-weight:700} .alt-grid{display:grid;grid-template-columns:repeat(auto-fit,minmax(200px,1fr));gap:12px;margin:16px 0} .alt-card{border:1px solid #e5e7eb;padding:16px;text-decoration:none;color:inherit;transition:border-color 0.2s} .alt-card:hover{border-color:#0d9488;text-decoration:none} .alt-card .alt-name{font-weight:700;font-size:15px;color:#1a1a1a;margin-bottom:4px} .alt-card .alt-score{font-family:ui-monospace,'SF Mono',monospace;font-size:13px;color:#0d9488} .alt-card .alt-cat{font-size:12px;color:#6b7280} .faq-section{margin:24px 0} .faq-item{border-bottom:1px solid #e5e7eb;padding:16px 0} .faq-item:first-child{border-top:1px solid #e5e7eb} .faq-q{font-weight:700;font-size:1rem;color:#1a1a1a;margin-bottom:8px} .faq-a{font-size:15px;color:#374151;line-height:1.7} .badge-embed{background:#f5f5f5;padding:16px;margin:12px 0} .badge-embed pre{user-select:all;cursor:pointer;font-size:12px;margin:8px 0 0}

Is mcp-expense-tracker MCP Server Safe? Trust Score: 72.2/100

Independent trust assessment for the mcp-expense-tracker MCP server. Category: uncategorized. Source: github.

mcp-expense-tracker is an MCP server with a Nerq Trust Score of 72.2/100 (B). Ranked #1226 of 31254 MCP servers on Nerq. Nerq Verified — recommended for production use. Its strongest signal is compliance (100/100). Last verified: 2026-04-28.
72.2
out of 100 — Nerq MCP Server Trust Score
B MCP Server uncategorized verified

Trust Assessment

Trusted — mcp-expense-tracker demonstrates solid trust signals and meets the Nerq Verified threshold. It shows good security practices, active maintenance, and healthy community adoption.

Trust Signal Breakdown

Security
0
Code quality, vulnerability exposure, and security practices.
Compliance
100
Regulatory alignment. EU AI Act risk class: N/A.
Maintenance
0
Update frequency, issue responsiveness, active development.
Documentation
0
README quality, API docs, usage examples.
Popularity
0
Community adoption. 0 stars on github.

Details

Authorkartikkk2005
Categoryuncategorized
Stars0
Sourcehttps://github.com/kartikkk2005/mcp-expense-tracker
ProtocolMCP (Model Context Protocol)
Popularity#1226 of 31254 MCP servers

Frequently Asked Questions

Is mcp-expense-tracker MCP server safe to use?
mcp-expense-tracker has a Nerq Trust Score of 72.2/100, earning a B grade. Trusted — mcp-expense-tracker demonstrates solid trust signals and meets the Nerq Verified threshold. It shows good security practices, active maintenance, and healthy community adoption. Its strongest signal is compliance (100/100). It is Nerq Verified, meeting the 70+ trust threshold. Always review the full KYA report before integrating any MCP server into production.
What is mcp-expense-tracker's trust score?
Nerq assigns mcp-expense-tracker a trust score of 72.2 out of 100, with a grade of B. This score is computed from security, compliance, maintenance activity, documentation quality, and community adoption (0 stars). Compliance score: 100/100. Scores are updated daily based on the latest publicly available signals.
Are there higher-rated alternatives to mcp-expense-tracker?
In the uncategorized category, no higher-rated MCP servers were found — this is among the top-rated. mcp-expense-tracker scores 72.2/100. When choosing between MCP servers, consider security (0), maintenance (0), and documentation (0). Use Nerq's KYA endpoint for detailed analysis.

Badge Embed

Nerq Trust Score for mcp-expense-tracker

Add this trust badge to your README:

[![Nerq Trust Score](https://nerq.ai/badge/mcp-expense-tracker)](https://nerq.ai/mcp/mcp-expense-tracker)
Check MCP server trust
Full KYA report for mcp-expense-tracker · Preflight API
Explore MCP ecosystem
All MCP servers · Agent safety · Compare
API docs · Trust Oracle

Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence before integrating any MCP server.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy