.ai-summary{background:#f9fafb;border-left:3px solid #0d9488;padding:16px 20px;margin:16px 0;font-size:15px;line-height:1.7;color:#374151} .score-hero{text-align:center;padding:32px 16px;border:1px solid #e5e7eb;margin:16px 0} .score-hero .big-score{font-family:ui-monospace,'SF Mono',monospace;font-size:3.5rem;font-weight:700;color:#0d9488;line-height:1} .score-hero .score-sub{font-size:14px;color:#6b7280;margin:4px 0 12px} .badges{display:flex;gap:8px;justify-content:center;flex-wrap:wrap} .signals-grid{display:grid;grid-template-columns:repeat(auto-fit,minmax(200px,1fr));gap:12px;margin:16px 0} .signal-card{border:1px solid #e5e7eb;padding:16px} .signal-card .sig-name{font-size:12px;color:#6b7280;font-weight:600;text-transform:uppercase;letter-spacing:0.03em;margin-bottom:4px} .signal-card .sig-val{font-family:ui-monospace,'SF Mono',monospace;font-size:1.5rem;font-weight:700;color:#1a1a1a} .signal-card .sig-desc{font-size:13px;color:#6b7280;margin-top:6px} .caps-list{list-style:none;padding:0;margin:12px 0} .caps-list li{padding:6px 0;border-bottom:1px solid #f3f4f6;font-size:14px} .caps-list li::before{content:"→ ";color:#0d9488;font-weight:700} .alt-grid{display:grid;grid-template-columns:repeat(auto-fit,minmax(200px,1fr));gap:12px;margin:16px 0} .alt-card{border:1px solid #e5e7eb;padding:16px;text-decoration:none;color:inherit;transition:border-color 0.2s} .alt-card:hover{border-color:#0d9488;text-decoration:none} .alt-card .alt-name{font-weight:700;font-size:15px;color:#1a1a1a;margin-bottom:4px} .alt-card .alt-score{font-family:ui-monospace,'SF Mono',monospace;font-size:13px;color:#0d9488} .alt-card .alt-cat{font-size:12px;color:#6b7280} .faq-section{margin:24px 0} .faq-item{border-bottom:1px solid #e5e7eb;padding:16px 0} .faq-item:first-child{border-top:1px solid #e5e7eb} .faq-q{font-weight:700;font-size:1rem;color:#1a1a1a;margin-bottom:8px} .faq-a{font-size:15px;color:#374151;line-height:1.7} .badge-embed{background:#f5f5f5;padding:16px;margin:12px 0} .badge-embed pre{user-select:all;cursor:pointer;font-size:12px;margin:8px 0 0}

Is mcp-build-verifier MCP Server Safe? Trust Score: 71.9/100

Independent trust assessment for the mcp-build-verifier MCP server. Category: devops. Source: github.

mcp-build-verifier is an MCP server with a Nerq Trust Score of 71.9/100 (B). Ranked #612 of 31232 MCP servers on Nerq. Nerq Verified — recommended for production use. Its strongest signal is compliance (100/100). Last verified: 2026-04-28.
71.9
out of 100 — Nerq MCP Server Trust Score
B MCP Server devops verified

Trust Assessment

Trusted — mcp-build-verifier demonstrates solid trust signals and meets the Nerq Verified threshold. It shows good security practices, active maintenance, and healthy community adoption.

Trust Signal Breakdown

Security
0
Code quality, vulnerability exposure, and security practices.
Compliance
100
Regulatory alignment. EU AI Act risk class: minimal.
Maintenance
1
Update frequency, issue responsiveness, active development.
Documentation
1
README quality, API docs, usage examples.
Popularity
0
Community adoption. 0 stars on github.

Details

Authorcicarulez
Categorydevops
Stars0
Sourcehttps://github.com/cicarulez/mcp-build-verifier
ProtocolMCP (Model Context Protocol)
Popularity#612 of 31232 MCP servers
Frameworksmcp

Higher-Rated MCP Servers in devops

Frequently Asked Questions

Is mcp-build-verifier MCP server safe to use?
mcp-build-verifier has a Nerq Trust Score of 71.9/100, earning a B grade. Trusted — mcp-build-verifier demonstrates solid trust signals and meets the Nerq Verified threshold. It shows good security practices, active maintenance, and healthy community adoption. Its strongest signal is compliance (100/100). It is Nerq Verified, meeting the 70+ trust threshold. Always review the full KYA report before integrating any MCP server into production.
What is mcp-build-verifier's trust score?
Nerq assigns mcp-build-verifier a trust score of 71.9 out of 100, with a grade of B. This score is computed from security, compliance, maintenance activity, documentation quality, and community adoption (0 stars). Compliance score: 100/100. EU AI Act risk class: minimal. Scores are updated daily based on the latest publicly available signals.
Are there higher-rated alternatives to mcp-build-verifier?
In the devops category, higher-rated MCP servers include mcp, tomcat-mcp, controlplaneio-fluxcd/flux-operator (scores: 76, 76, 74). mcp-build-verifier scores 71.9/100. When choosing between MCP servers, consider security (0), maintenance (1), and documentation (1). Use Nerq's KYA endpoint for detailed analysis.

Badge Embed

Nerq Trust Score for mcp-build-verifier

Add this trust badge to your README:

[![Nerq Trust Score](https://nerq.ai/badge/mcp-build-verifier)](https://nerq.ai/mcp/mcp-build-verifier)
Check MCP server trust
Full KYA report for mcp-build-verifier · Preflight API Safety Report
Explore MCP ecosystem
All MCP servers · Agent safety · Compare
API docs · Trust Oracle

Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence before integrating any MCP server.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy