Trust Assessment
Trusted — context-window-manager demonstrates solid trust signals and meets the Nerq Verified threshold. It shows good security practices, active maintenance, and healthy community adoption.
Is context-window-manager MCP Server Safe? Trust Score: 73.4/100
Independent trust assessment for the context-window-manager MCP server. Category: infrastructure. Source: mcp.
context-window-manager is an MCP server with a Nerq Trust Score of 73.4/100 (B). Ranked #224 of 31254 MCP servers on Nerq. Nerq Verified — recommended for production use. Its strongest signal is compliance (92/100). Last verified: 2026-04-28.
73.4
out of 100 — Nerq MCP Server Trust Score
B
MCP Server
infrastructure
verified
Trust Signal Breakdown
Security
0
Code quality, vulnerability exposure, and security practices.
Compliance
92
Regulatory alignment. EU AI Act risk class: minimal.
Maintenance
1
Update frequency, issue responsiveness, active development.
Documentation
1
README quality, API docs, usage examples.
Popularity
0
Community adoption. 0 stars on mcp.
Details
| Author | mcp-tool-shop-org |
| Category | infrastructure |
| Stars | 0 |
| Source | https://github.com/mcp-tool-shop-org/context-window-manager |
| Protocol | MCP (Model Context Protocol) |
| Popularity | #224 of 31254 MCP servers |
Higher-Rated MCP Servers in infrastructure
Frequently Asked Questions
Is context-window-manager MCP server safe to use?
context-window-manager has a Nerq Trust Score of 73.4/100, earning a B grade. Trusted — context-window-manager demonstrates solid trust signals and meets the Nerq Verified threshold. It shows good security practices, active maintenance, and healthy community adoption. Its strongest signal is compliance (92/100). It is Nerq Verified, meeting the 70+ trust threshold. Always review the full KYA report before integrating any MCP server into production.
What is context-window-manager's trust score?
Nerq assigns context-window-manager a trust score of 73.4 out of 100, with a grade of B. This score is computed from security, compliance, maintenance activity, documentation quality, and community adoption (0 stars). Compliance score: 92/100. EU AI Act risk class: minimal. Scores are updated daily based on the latest publicly available signals.
Are there higher-rated alternatives to context-window-manager?
In the infrastructure category, higher-rated MCP servers include auth0/auth0-mcp-server, gcloud-mcp, strava-mcp (scores: 85, 81, 80). context-window-manager scores 73.4/100. When choosing between MCP servers, consider security (0), maintenance (1), and documentation (1). Use Nerq's KYA endpoint for detailed analysis.
Badge Embed
Add this trust badge to your README:
[](https://nerq.ai/mcp/context-window-manager)
Check MCP server trust
Explore MCP ecosystem
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence before integrating any MCP server.