.ai-summary{background:#f9fafb;border-left:3px solid #0d9488;padding:16px 20px;margin:16px 0;font-size:15px;line-height:1.7;color:#374151} .score-hero{text-align:center;padding:32px 16px;border:1px solid #e5e7eb;margin:16px 0} .score-hero .big-score{font-family:ui-monospace,'SF Mono',monospace;font-size:3.5rem;font-weight:700;color:#0d9488;line-height:1} .score-hero .score-sub{font-size:14px;color:#6b7280;margin:4px 0 12px} .badges{display:flex;gap:8px;justify-content:center;flex-wrap:wrap} .signals-grid{display:grid;grid-template-columns:repeat(auto-fit,minmax(200px,1fr));gap:12px;margin:16px 0} .signal-card{border:1px solid #e5e7eb;padding:16px} .signal-card .sig-name{font-size:12px;color:#6b7280;font-weight:600;text-transform:uppercase;letter-spacing:0.03em;margin-bottom:4px} .signal-card .sig-val{font-family:ui-monospace,'SF Mono',monospace;font-size:1.5rem;font-weight:700;color:#1a1a1a} .signal-card .sig-desc{font-size:13px;color:#6b7280;margin-top:6px} .caps-list{list-style:none;padding:0;margin:12px 0} .caps-list li{padding:6px 0;border-bottom:1px solid #f3f4f6;font-size:14px} .caps-list li::before{content:"→ ";color:#0d9488;font-weight:700} .alt-grid{display:grid;grid-template-columns:repeat(auto-fit,minmax(200px,1fr));gap:12px;margin:16px 0} .alt-card{border:1px solid #e5e7eb;padding:16px;text-decoration:none;color:inherit;transition:border-color 0.2s} .alt-card:hover{border-color:#0d9488;text-decoration:none} .alt-card .alt-name{font-weight:700;font-size:15px;color:#1a1a1a;margin-bottom:4px} .alt-card .alt-score{font-family:ui-monospace,'SF Mono',monospace;font-size:13px;color:#0d9488} .alt-card .alt-cat{font-size:12px;color:#6b7280} .faq-section{margin:24px 0} .faq-item{border-bottom:1px solid #e5e7eb;padding:16px 0} .faq-item:first-child{border-top:1px solid #e5e7eb} .faq-q{font-weight:700;font-size:1rem;color:#1a1a1a;margin-bottom:8px} .faq-a{font-size:15px;color:#374151;line-height:1.7} .badge-embed{background:#f5f5f5;padding:16px;margin:12px 0} .badge-embed pre{user-select:all;cursor:pointer;font-size:12px;margin:8px 0 0}

Is chaining-mcp-server MCP Server Safe? Trust Score: 73.2/100

Independent trust assessment for the chaining-mcp-server MCP server. Category: infrastructure. Source: github.

chaining-mcp-server is an MCP server with a Nerq Trust Score of 73.2/100 (B). Ranked #462 of 31183 MCP servers on Nerq. Nerq Verified — recommended for production use. Its strongest signal is compliance (100/100). Last verified: 2026-04-28.
73.2
out of 100 — Nerq MCP Server Trust Score
B MCP Server infrastructure verified

Trust Assessment

Trusted — chaining-mcp-server demonstrates solid trust signals and meets the Nerq Verified threshold. It shows good security practices, active maintenance, and healthy community adoption.

Trust Signal Breakdown

Security
0
Code quality, vulnerability exposure, and security practices.
Compliance
100
Regulatory alignment. EU AI Act risk class: minimal.
Maintenance
1
Update frequency, issue responsiveness, active development.
Documentation
1
README quality, API docs, usage examples.
Popularity
0
Community adoption. 1 stars on github.

Details

Author1999AZZAR
Categoryinfrastructure
Stars1
Sourcehttps://github.com/1999AZZAR/chaining-mcp-server
ProtocolMCP (Model Context Protocol)
Popularity#462 of 31183 MCP servers
Frameworksmcp

Higher-Rated MCP Servers in infrastructure

Frequently Asked Questions

Is chaining-mcp-server MCP server safe to use?
chaining-mcp-server has a Nerq Trust Score of 73.2/100, earning a B grade. Trusted — chaining-mcp-server demonstrates solid trust signals and meets the Nerq Verified threshold. It shows good security practices, active maintenance, and healthy community adoption. Its strongest signal is compliance (100/100). It is Nerq Verified, meeting the 70+ trust threshold. Always review the full KYA report before integrating any MCP server into production.
What is chaining-mcp-server's trust score?
Nerq assigns chaining-mcp-server a trust score of 73.2 out of 100, with a grade of B. This score is computed from security, compliance, maintenance activity, documentation quality, and community adoption (1 stars). Compliance score: 100/100. EU AI Act risk class: minimal. Scores are updated daily based on the latest publicly available signals.
Are there higher-rated alternatives to chaining-mcp-server?
In the infrastructure category, higher-rated MCP servers include auth0/auth0-mcp-server, gcloud-mcp, strava-mcp (scores: 85, 81, 80). chaining-mcp-server scores 73.2/100. When choosing between MCP servers, consider security (0), maintenance (1), and documentation (1). Use Nerq's KYA endpoint for detailed analysis.

Badge Embed

Nerq Trust Score for chaining-mcp-server

Add this trust badge to your README:

[![Nerq Trust Score](https://nerq.ai/badge/chaining-mcp-server)](https://nerq.ai/mcp/chaining-mcp-server)
Check MCP server trust
Full KYA report for chaining-mcp-server · Preflight API Safety Report
Explore MCP ecosystem
All MCP servers · Agent safety · Compare
API docs · Trust Oracle

Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence before integrating any MCP server.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy