firecrawl/firecrawl vs MinerU: Trust, Security & Compatibility 2026
Category: data · Winner: MinerU
| Metric | firecrawl/firecrawl | MinerU |
|---|---|---|
| Trust Score | 74/100 | 85/100 |
| Grade | B | A |
| Stars | 84,307 | 54,130 |
| Compliance | 100/100 | 100/100 |
| Source | github | github |
Choosing between firecrawl/firecrawl and MinerU? This independent comparison analyzes both data tools across trust scores, security vulnerabilities, compliance, and community health — all based on Nerq's analysis of 204K+ AI assets.
Trust Score Comparison
| Metric | firecrawl/firecrawl | MinerU |
|--------|----------|----------|
| Trust Score | 74/100 | 85/100 |
| Grade | B | A |
| Stars | 84,307 | 54,130 |
| Compliance | 100/100 | 100/100 |
| Source | github | github |
Overview
**firecrawl/firecrawl**: Turn entire websites into LLM-ready markdown or structured data.
**MinerU**: MinerU transforms complex documents into LLM-ready formats for workflows.
Verdict
Based on Nerq's independent analysis across 13+ data sources and 52 global AI regulations, **MinerU** scores higher with a trust score of 85/100. MinerU has a clear advantage in the data category.
When choosing between these tools, consider your specific requirements:
- If community size matters most: choose firecrawl/firecrawl (84,307 stars)
- If compliance is critical: choose MinerU (100/100 compliance)
- If overall trust is the priority: choose MinerU (85/100)
Always run `nerq check firecrawl` before integrating any AI tool.
---
*Trust scores by [Nerq](https://nerq.ai). Updated daily. [Check any agent](https://nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=firecrawl/firecrawl).*