CursorTouch/Windows-MCP Alternatives

Safer and better-maintained options, ranked by Nerq Trust Score. Updated 2026-04-28.

CursorTouch/Windows-MCP has a Nerq Trust Score of 68 (B-). MCP Server for Computer Use in Windows

#	Name	Trust	Grade	Stars	Key Difference
1	asvs-auditor	75	B	-	Higher trust (75 vs 68)
2	ai-scrm	75	B	1	Higher trust (75 vs 68)
3	agentscan	74	B	-	Higher trust (74 vs 68)
4	FedRAMP20xMCP	73	B	3	Higher trust (73 vs 68)
5	rangta10/kali-mcp-server	73	B	3	Higher trust (73 vs 68)
6	microsoft-security-threatintel-mcp	73	B	-	Higher trust (73 vs 68)
7	bugbounty-multiagent-ia	73	B	-	Higher trust (73 vs 68)
8	msis-617-management-of-supply-chain	73	B	-	Higher trust (73 vs 68)
9	AI-Forensic-Investigator	73	B	-	Higher trust (73 vs 68)
10	agentic-honeypot-ai	73	B	-	Higher trust (73 vs 68)
11	qualifire-dev/rogue	73	B	1.0k	Higher trust (73 vs 68)
12	clawscan	72	B	1	Higher trust (72 vs 68)
13	mcp-workboard	72	B	-	Higher trust (72 vs 68)
14	security-skill-scanner	72	B	-	Higher trust (72 vs 68)
15	genai-security-agent-capstone-2025	72	B	-	Higher trust (72 vs 68)

Compare

What are the best alternatives to CursorTouch/Windows-MCP?

The top alternatives based on Nerq Trust Score are listed above, all independently evaluated for security and reliability.

Is it safe to switch from CursorTouch/Windows-MCP?

Check each alternative's safety report by clicking its name. Trust scores above 70 indicate strong reliability.

How does Nerq rank CursorTouch/Windows-MCP alternatives?

Alternatives are ranked by Trust Score v2, combining security, maintenance, documentation, and community signals.