SylphxAI/filesystem-mcp Alternatives

Safer and better-maintained options, ranked by Nerq Trust Score. Updated 2026-06-20.

SylphxAI/filesystem-mcp has a Nerq Trust Score of 62 (C). 📁 Secure, efficient MCP filesystem server - token-saving batch operations with project root confinement

#NameTrustGradeStarsKey Difference
1cyanheads/git-mcp-server89B+-Higher trust (89 vs 62)
2auth0/auth0-mcp-server85A-Higher trust (85 vs 62)
3arabold/docs-mcp-server84A1.1kHigher trust (84 vs 62); Much larger community
4gcloud-mcp81D-Higher trust (81 vs 62)
5mcp81A1.4kHigher trust (81 vs 62); Much larger community
6strava-mcp80A-Higher trust (80 vs 62)
7smart-mcp-proxy/mcpproxy-go79B156Higher trust (79 vs 62); Much larger community
8claude-kvm76B-Higher trust (76 vs 62)
9hyper-mcp-rs/hyper-mcp74B862Higher trust (74 vs 62); Much larger community
10guildbridge74B-Higher trust (74 vs 62)
11filesystem-mcp73B2Higher trust (73 vs 62)
12trustrails-mcp-server73B-Higher trust (73 vs 62)
13antigravity-coordinator73B-Higher trust (73 vs 62)
14Klavis-AI/klavis73B5.6kHigher trust (73 vs 62); Much larger community
15zookeeper73B1.5kHigher trust (73 vs 62); Much larger community

Compare

FAQ

What are the best alternatives to SylphxAI/filesystem-mcp?

The top alternatives based on Nerq Trust Score are listed above, all independently evaluated for security and reliability.

Is it safe to switch from SylphxAI/filesystem-mcp?

Check each alternative's safety report by clicking its name. Trust scores above 70 indicate strong reliability.

How does Nerq rank SylphxAI/filesystem-mcp alternatives?

Alternatives are ranked by Trust Score v2, combining security, maintenance, documentation, and community signals.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy