strava-mcp Alternatives

Safer and better-maintained options, ranked by Nerq Trust Score. Updated 2026-05-02.

strava-mcp has a Nerq Trust Score of 80 (A). A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for accessing Strava data through AI.

#	Name	Trust	Grade	Stars	Key Difference
1	cyanheads/git-mcp-server	89	A	185	Higher trust (89 vs 80)
2	auth0/auth0-mcp-server	85	A	-	Higher trust (85 vs 80)
3	arabold/docs-mcp-server	84	A	1.1k	Higher trust (84 vs 80); Much larger community
4	gcloud-mcp	81	D	-	Higher trust (81 vs 80)
5	mcp	81	A	1.4k	Higher trust (81 vs 80); Much larger community
6	smart-mcp-proxy/mcpproxy-go	79	B	156	Lower trust (79 vs 80)
7	vinkius-labs/mcp-fusion	78	B	195	Lower trust (78 vs 80)
8	rinadelph/Agent-MCP	76	B+	1.2k	Lower trust (76 vs 80); Much larger community
9	Office-PowerPoint-MCP-Server	76	B+	-	Lower trust (76 vs 80)
10	instill-ai/instill-core	76	B+	2.3k	Lower trust (76 vs 80); Much larger community
11	claude-kvm	76	B	-	Lower trust (76 vs 80)
12	memory-mcp	75	B	1	Lower trust (75 vs 80)
13	timescale/pg-aiguide	75	B	1.6k	Lower trust (75 vs 80); Much larger community
14	wonderwhy-er/DesktopCommanderMCP	74	B	5.6k	Lower trust (74 vs 80); Much larger community
15	hyper-mcp-rs/hyper-mcp	74	B	862	Lower trust (74 vs 80); Much larger community

Compare

What are the best alternatives to strava-mcp?

The top alternatives based on Nerq Trust Score are listed above, all independently evaluated for security and reliability.

Is it safe to switch from strava-mcp?

Check each alternative's safety report by clicking its name. Trust scores above 70 indicate strong reliability.

How does Nerq rank strava-mcp alternatives?

Alternatives are ranked by Trust Score v2, combining security, maintenance, documentation, and community signals.