run-llama/LlamaIndexTS Alternatives

Safer and better-maintained options, ranked by Nerq Trust Score. Updated 2026-03-19.

run-llama/LlamaIndexTS has a Nerq Trust Score of 82 (A). Data framework for your LLM applications. Focus on server side solution

#	Name	Trust	Grade	Stars	Key Difference
1	Giskard-AI/giskard-oss	91	A+	5.1k	Higher trust (91 vs 82); More stars
2	mlflow/mlflow	87	A	24.7k	Higher trust (87 vs 82); Much larger community
3	MemMachine/MemMachine	87	A	4.4k	Higher trust (87 vs 82); More stars
4	RLinf/RLinf	87	A	2.5k	Higher trust (87 vs 82)
5	UnicomAI/wanwu	87	A	4.1k	Higher trust (87 vs 82); More stars
6	yamadashy/repomix	87	A	22.0k	Higher trust (87 vs 82); Much larger community
7	MODSetter/SurfSense	87	A	13.1k	Higher trust (87 vs 82); Much larger community
8	AgentEra/Agently	86	A	1.5k	Higher trust (86 vs 82)
9	microsoft/ai-agents-for-beginners	86	A	51.9k	Higher trust (86 vs 82); Much larger community
10	InternLM/xtuner	86	A	5.1k	Higher trust (86 vs 82); More stars
11	Dicklesworthstone/agentic_coding_flywheel_setup	86	A	1.2k	Higher trust (86 vs 82)
12	JudgmentLabs/judgeval	86	A	1.0k	Higher trust (86 vs 82)
13	ruvnet/claude-flow	86	A	14.4k	Higher trust (86 vs 82); Much larger community
14	MervinPraison/PraisonAI	86	A	5.6k	Higher trust (86 vs 82); More stars
15	phodal/auto-dev	85	A	4.4k	Higher trust (85 vs 82); More stars

Compare

What are the best alternatives to run-llama/LlamaIndexTS?

The top alternatives based on Nerq Trust Score are listed above, all independently evaluated for security and reliability.

Is it safe to switch from run-llama/LlamaIndexTS?

Check each alternative's safety report by clicking its name. Trust scores above 70 indicate strong reliability.

How does Nerq rank run-llama/LlamaIndexTS alternatives?

Alternatives are ranked by Trust Score v2, combining security, maintenance, documentation, and community signals.