liquidos-ai/AutoAgents Alternatives
Safer and better-maintained options, ranked by Nerq Trust Score. Updated 2026-03-19.
liquidos-ai/AutoAgents has a Nerq Trust Score of 82 (A). A multi-agent framework written in Rust that enables you to build, deploy, and coordinate multiple intelligent agents
| # | Name | Trust | Grade | Stars | Key Difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | crewAIInc/crewAI | 92 | A+ | 45.0k | Higher trust (92 vs 82); Much larger community |
| 2 | baidu-baige/LoongFlow | 86 | A | 351 | Higher trust (86 vs 82) |
| 3 | goclaw | 80 | A | 143 | Lower trust (80 vs 82) |
| 4 | hashbrown | 77 | B | 614 | Lower trust (77 vs 82); More stars |
| 5 | aembit_agent_controller | 60 | D | 1 | Lower trust (60 vs 82) |
| 6 | pi0_libero_base | 56 | D | 10 | Lower trust (56 vs 82) |
| 7 | agent_dev | 56 | D | - | Lower trust (56 vs 82) |
| 8 | gemma3 | 55 | D | 1 | Lower trust (55 vs 82) |
| 9 | neco_agents | 55 | D | - | Lower trust (55 vs 82) |
| 10 | MN-12B-WolFrame-Ver.B | 54 | D | 1 | Lower trust (54 vs 82) |
| 11 | amf_illoc_force_intent_recognition | 54 | D | 1 | Lower trust (54 vs 82) |
| 12 | Multi-System_Persona_Framework_MSPF | 53 | D | 1 | Lower trust (53 vs 82) |
| 13 | First_agent_templates | 53 | D | - | Lower trust (53 vs 82) |
| 14 | MY_First_agent_template | 52 | D | 1 | Lower trust (52 vs 82) |
| 15 | serving_cmd_activator | 52 | D | - | Lower trust (52 vs 82) |
Compare
- liquidos-ai/AutoAgents vs crewAIInc/crewAI
- liquidos-ai/AutoAgents vs baidu-baige/LoongFlow
- liquidos-ai/AutoAgents vs goclaw
- liquidos-ai/AutoAgents vs hashbrown
- liquidos-ai/AutoAgents vs aembit_agent_controller
FAQ
What are the best alternatives to liquidos-ai/AutoAgents?
The top alternatives based on Nerq Trust Score are listed above, all independently evaluated for security and reliability.
Is it safe to switch from liquidos-ai/AutoAgents?
Check each alternative's safety report by clicking its name. Trust scores above 70 indicate strong reliability.
How does Nerq rank liquidos-ai/AutoAgents alternatives?
Alternatives are ranked by Trust Score v2, combining security, maintenance, documentation, and community signals.