ai-arize-agent-evaluation Alternatives

Safer and better-maintained options, ranked by Nerq Trust Score. Updated 2026-05-05.

ai-arize-agent-evaluation has a Nerq Trust Score of 63 (C). AI agent evaluation using Arize Phoenix

#	Name	Trust	Grade	Stars	Key Difference
1	datacendia-core	66	C	1	Higher trust (66 vs 63)
2	Super-Agent-Skills	66	C	-	Higher trust (66 vs 63)
3	aiagent	65	C	-	Higher trust (65 vs 63)
4	AiAgent	64	C	-	Higher trust (64 vs 63)
5	Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct	63	C	535	Higher trust (63 vs 63); Much larger community
6	llama-2-13b-chat	63	C	-	Higher trust (63 vs 63)
7	gpt-oss	63	C	40	Lower trust (63 vs 63); Much larger community
8	qwen3-vl	63	C	8	Lower trust (63 vs 63); Much larger community
9	project-pandora	62	C	1	Lower trust (62 vs 63)
10	agent-zero	62	C	32	Lower trust (62 vs 63); Much larger community
11	Meta-Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct	62	C	39	Lower trust (62 vs 63); Much larger community
12	Qwen3-14B-GGUF	62	C	8	Lower trust (62 vs 63); Much larger community
13	Qwen3-8B-GGUF	62	C	8	Lower trust (62 vs 63); Much larger community
14	Qwen3-4B-GGUF	62	C	7	Lower trust (62 vs 63); Much larger community
15	Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct-MLX-4bit	62	C	6	Lower trust (62 vs 63); More stars

Compare

What are the best alternatives to ai-arize-agent-evaluation?

The top alternatives based on Nerq Trust Score are listed above, all independently evaluated for security and reliability.

Is it safe to switch from ai-arize-agent-evaluation?

Check each alternative's safety report by clicking its name. Trust scores above 70 indicate strong reliability.

How does Nerq rank ai-arize-agent-evaluation alternatives?

Alternatives are ranked by Trust Score v2, combining security, maintenance, documentation, and community signals.