patient-recruitment-scorer is a mcp_server sourced from github, with a Nerq Trust Score of C (68/100) and a compliance score of 42/100 across 52 jurisdictions. It is classified as HIGH risk, with 32 high-risk classifications and 16 minimal-risk classifications. Assessed by Nerq, the world's largest AI agent trust database covering 5M+ AI assets across 52 global jurisdictions.
Last assessed: March 10, 2026 | Data from Nerq's weighted multi-jurisdiction compliance engineMCP server for scoring patient eligibility and recruitment likelihood for clinical trials
Each jurisdiction has unique AI regulation requirements. This table shows how patient-recruitment-scorer is classified under each jurisdiction's specific rules based on its type (mcp_server), domain (healthcare), and risk indicators.
| Jurisdiction | Risk Level | Compliance Notes | Effective Date | Max Penalty |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| California AI Training Data Transparency Act US |
MINIMAL RISK | Not a public-use generative AI system | 2026-01-01 | $5,000 per violation per day |
| California AI Transparency Act US |
MINIMAL RISK | Not subject to watermarking requirements | 2026-08-02 | $5,000 per violation |
| California Companion Chatbot Safety Act US |
MINIMAL RISK | Not a companion chatbot | 2026-01-01 | AG enforcement |
| California Frontier AI Act US |
MINIMAL RISK | Not a covered frontier model under SB 53 | 2026-01-01 | $10M to $50M per violation |
| China AI Content Labeling Rules CN |
MINIMAL RISK | 2025-09-01 | CAC enforcement measures | |
| China Cybersecurity Amendment CN |
MINIMAL RISK | 2026-01-01 | ¥1M to ¥10M | |
| Colombia AI Ethics Framework CO |
MINIMAL RISK | 2024-01-01 | N/A (voluntary) | |
| India IT Rules (AI Amendments 2026) IN |
MINIMAL RISK | 2026-02-20 | Loss of safe harbor protection | |
| ISO/IEC 42001 AI Management System INTL |
MINIMAL RISK | ISO/IEC 42001 certification available for AI management systems | 2023-12-18 | N/A (certification standard) |
| New York RAISE Act US |
MINIMAL RISK | Not a covered frontier model | 2027-01-01 | $25M per violation |
| New Zealand Algorithm Charter NZ |
MINIMAL RISK | 2020-07-01 | N/A (voluntary charter) | |
| Peru AI Promotion Law PE |
MINIMAL RISK | 2023-07-01 | Administrative guidance | |
| TAKE IT DOWN Act (Federal) US |
MINIMAL RISK | 2026-05-19 | 3 years imprisonment | |
| Texas RAIGA US |
MINIMAL RISK | Not a restricted-purpose AI system under TRAIGA | 2026-01-01 | Administrative remedies |
| Utah AI Amendments US |
MINIMAL RISK | 2025-05-07 | Professional licensing penalties | |
| Utah AI Policy Act US |
MINIMAL RISK | 2024-05-01 | UDCP enforcement | |
| Japan AI Bill JP |
LIMITED RISK | Principles-based: government may publicly name non-cooperative companies | 2025-05-01 | Administrative guidance |
| OECD AI Principles INTL |
LIMITED RISK | OECD principles: trustworthy AI assessment recommended | 2024-05-02 | N/A (voluntary principles) |
| Taiwan AI Basic Act TW |
LIMITED RISK | Principles-based: governance adoption recommended for high-risk AI | 2025-07-23 | Administrative guidance |
| Thailand AI Governance Guidelines TH |
LIMITED RISK | Voluntary: ethics principles compliance recommended | 2024-01-01 | N/A (voluntary) |
| Australia Mandatory AI Guardrails AU |
HIGH RISK | Mandatory guardrails: transparency, testing, human oversight required (proposed) | 2026-TBD | TBD (legislation pending) |
| Brazil AI Bill BR |
HIGH RISK | High-risk: impact assessment, strict liability (proposed) | TBD | R$ 50M or 2% revenue |
| Canada AIDA CA |
HIGH RISK | High-impact system: risk assessment, mitigation, monitoring required (proposed) | TBD | CAD $25M or 5% revenue |
| Chile AI Regulation Bill CL |
HIGH RISK | High-risk classification under proposed legislation | TBD | TBD |
| Colorado AI Act US |
HIGH RISK | High-risk: consequential decision tool. Requires impact assessment, consumer notification, annual bias audit. | 2026-06-30 | $500,000 per violation |
| Connecticut AI / Automated Decision Act US |
HIGH RISK | Automated decision system: impact assessment, opt-out rights, human review required | 2026-07-01 | AG enforcement under CTDPA |
| Council of Europe AI Convention INTL |
HIGH RISK | Rights-impacting AI: transparency, accountability, remedies required | 2025-09-01 | Treaty obligations (national enforcement) |
| EU AI Act EU |
HIGH RISK | High-risk: requires conformity assessment (Art. 43), CE marking, risk management (Art. 9) | 2026-08-02 | €35M or 7% global turnover |
| France AI Act Implementation FR |
HIGH RISK | High-risk: requires conformity assessment (Art. 43), CE marking, risk management (Art. 9) | 2026-08-02 | €35M or 7% global turnover (EU AI Act) |
| Germany AI Act Implementation DE |
HIGH RISK | High-risk: requires conformity assessment (Art. 43), CE marking, risk management (Art. 9) | 2026-08-02 | €35M or 7% global turnover (EU AI Act) |
| Illinois AI in Employment Act US |
HIGH RISK | Employment AI: requires notice, explanation, right to human review | 2026-01-01 | Human Rights Act penalties |
| Illinois AI Video Interview Act US |
HIGH RISK | Employment AI: requires notice, explanation, right to human review | 2020-01-01 | $5,000 per violation |
| India AI Governance Guidelines IN |
HIGH RISK | Sensitive sector: AI Safety Board pilot compliance recommended | 2025-12-01 | Voluntary (binding rules expected mid-2026) |
| Ireland AI Act Implementation IE |
HIGH RISK | High-risk: requires conformity assessment (Art. 43), CE marking, risk management (Art. 9) | 2026-08-02 | €35M or 7% global turnover (EU AI Act) |
| Italy AI Act Implementation IT |
HIGH RISK | High-risk: requires conformity assessment (Art. 43), CE marking, risk management (Art. 9) | 2026-08-02 | €35M or 7% global turnover (EU AI Act) |
| Kenya Data Protection (AI Provisions) KE |
HIGH RISK | Automated decision-making: data protection impact assessment required, right to object | 2021-11-25 | KES 5M or 1% annual turnover |
| Maryland AI in Employment & Housing Act US |
HIGH RISK | Must comply with anti-discrimination requirements for AI in employment | 2025-10-01 | Civil rights enforcement |
| Mexico AI Regulation Initiative MX |
HIGH RISK | High-risk classification under proposed legislation | TBD | TBD |
| Netherlands AI Act Implementation NL |
HIGH RISK | High-risk: requires conformity assessment (Art. 43), CE marking, risk management (Art. 9) | 2026-08-02 | €35M or 7% global turnover (EU AI Act) |
| Nigeria Data Protection (AI Provisions) NG |
HIGH RISK | Automated decision-making: data protection impact assessment required, right to object | 2023-06-14 | NGN 10M or 2% annual turnover |
| NYC Local Law 144 (AEDT) US |
HIGH RISK | AEDT: requires annual independent bias audit, public results, 10-day candidate notice | 2023-07-05 | $1,500 per violation |
| Philippines AI Development Act PH |
HIGH RISK | Critical sector AI: development standards apply (proposed) | TBD | TBD |
| Poland AI Act Implementation PL |
HIGH RISK | High-risk: requires conformity assessment (Art. 43), CE marking, risk management (Art. 9) | 2026-08-02 | €35M or 7% global turnover (EU AI Act) |
| Saudi Arabia AI Ethics Principles SA |
HIGH RISK | SDAIA ethical principles: transparency and Vision 2030 alignment required | 2023-09-01 | SDAIA enforcement |
| Singapore AI Framework SG |
HIGH RISK | High-impact: voluntary governance framework recommends full compliance | TBD | N/A (voluntary) |
| South Africa POPIA (AI Provisions) ZA |
HIGH RISK | Automated decision-making: data protection impact assessment required, right to object | 2021-07-01 | ZAR 10M or imprisonment |
| South Korea AI Basic Act KR |
HIGH RISK | High-impact AI: risk assessment, human oversight, transparency required | 2026-01-22 | ₩300M or 3% revenue |
| Spain AI Act Implementation ES |
HIGH RISK | High-risk: requires conformity assessment (Art. 43), CE marking, risk management (Art. 9) | 2026-08-02 | €35M or 7% global turnover (EU AI Act) |
| Sweden AI Act Implementation SE |
HIGH RISK | High-risk: requires conformity assessment (Art. 43), CE marking, risk management (Art. 9) | 2026-08-02 | €35M or 7% global turnover (EU AI Act) |
| UAE AI Strategy 2031 AE |
HIGH RISK | Requires AI licensing through DIFC/ADGM for commercial deployment | 2024-01-01 | Licensing revocation + fines |
| UK AI Regulation Bill UK |
HIGH RISK | Sector-specific regulation: oversight by relevant sector regulator | TBD | TBD by sector regulators |
| Vietnam AI Law VN |
HIGH RISK | Sensitive sector: risk assessment, human oversight, data protection required | 2026-TBD | VND 2B |
ZARQ provides independent crypto risk intelligence for 205 digital assets — trust ratings, distance-to-default scoring, and structural collapse detection.
Show your AI agent's compliance status with an embeddable badge:
Markdown:
[](https://nerq.ai/agent/c59b371c-22a3-4310-af86-990894181aeb)
HTML:
<a href="https://nerq.ai/agent/c59b371c-22a3-4310-af86-990894181aeb"><img src="https://nerq.ai/compliance/badge/c59b371c-22a3-4310-af86-990894181aeb.svg" alt="Nerq Compliance Status"></a>
patient-recruitment-scorer is a mcp_server sourced from github, authored by contextkits. It operates in the healthcare domain. Across global AI regulations, it is classified as high risk. Nerq has assessed this agent against 52 global AI regulations, finding it to be high risk or restricted in 32 jurisdictions, subject to transparency or limited requirements in 4 jurisdictions, and minimal risk or compliant in 16 jurisdictions.
This assessment was generated using Nerq's rule-based multi-jurisdiction compliance engine, which maps AI system characteristics against the specific criteria defined in each jurisdiction's AI regulation framework. The assessment covers enacted laws, proposed legislation, and voluntary frameworks across the EU, United States, United Kingdom, Asia-Pacific, Middle East, Africa, and Latin America. First indexed on Nerq: February 10, 2026.