Is Mcp Hive Safe?

Mcp Hive — Nerq Trust Score 72.8/100 (B grade). Score based on 5 independent trust signals.

Mcp Hive is a software tool with a Nerq Trust Score of 72.8/100 (B), based on 5 independent data dimensions. Security: 0/100. Maintenance: 0/100. Popularity: 0/100. Data sourced from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Last updated: n/a. Machine-readable data (JSON).

Is Mcp Hive safe?

Trust Score Breakdown — Mcp Hive has a Nerq Trust Score of 72.8/100 (B). Measured across 5 independent trust signals.

Security Analysis → Mcp Hive Privacy Report →

What is Mcp Hive's trust score?

Mcp Hive has a Nerq Trust Score of 72.8/100, earning a B grade. This score is based on 5 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.

Security
0
Compliance
80
Maintenance
0
Documentation
0
Popularity
0

What are the key security findings for Mcp Hive?

Mcp Hive's strongest signal is compliance at 80/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected.

Security score: 0/100 (weak)
Maintenance: 0/100 — low maintenance activity
Compliance: 80/100 — covers 41 of 52 jurisdictions
Documentation: 0/100 — limited documentation
Popularity: 0/100 — community adoption

What is Mcp Hive and who maintains it?

Authorhamsa0x7
CategoryUncategorized
Sourcehttps://github.com/hamsa0x7/mcp-hive
Frameworksopenai · anthropic
Protocolsmcp · rest

Regulatory Compliance

EU AI Act Risk ClassNot assessed
Compliance Score80/100
JurisdictionsAssessed across 52 jurisdictions

What Is Mcp Hive?

Mcp Hive is a software tool in the uncategorized category: 🐝 Parallel code analysis through specialized AI agents. Nerq Trust Score: 73/100 (B).

Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including security vulnerabilities, maintenance activity, license compliance, and community adoption.

How Nerq Assesses Mcp Hive's Safety

Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensions. Here is how Mcp Hive performs in each:

The overall Trust Score of 72.8/100 (B) is the weighted combination of these measured signals. It is a measurement, not a pass/fail or suitability judgment — weigh the individual signals against your own requirements.

Who Typically Evaluates Mcp Hive?

Mcp Hive is commonly evaluated by:

How to read the signals: Mcp Hive's measured signals (security 0/100, maintenance 0/100, documentation 0/100, community 0/100) are shown above. These are measurements, not a suitability judgment — weigh each signal against the requirements of your own use case and risk tolerance.

How to Verify Mcp Hive's Safety Yourself

While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:

  1. Check the source code — Review the repository's security policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active maintenance.
  2. Scan dependencies — Use tools like npm audit, pip-audit, or snyk to check for known vulnerabilities in Mcp Hive's dependency tree.
  3. Review permissions — Understand what access Mcp Hive requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
  4. Test in isolation — Run Mcp Hive in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
  5. Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=mcp-hive
  6. Review the license — Confirm that Mcp Hive's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
  7. Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses security concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.

Common Safety Concerns with Mcp Hive

When evaluating whether Mcp Hive is safe, consider these category-specific risks:

Data handling

Understand how Mcp Hive processes, stores, and transmits your data. Review the tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.

Dependency security

Check Mcp Hive's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher security risk.

Update frequency

Regularly check for updates to Mcp Hive. Security patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.

Third-party integrations

If Mcp Hive connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.

License and IP compliance

Verify that Mcp Hive's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Mcp Hive in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.

Best Practices for Using Mcp Hive Safely

Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Mcp Hive while minimizing risk:

Conduct regular audits

Periodically review how Mcp Hive is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and compliance with your security policies.

Keep dependencies updated

Ensure Mcp Hive and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from security patches.

Follow least privilege

Grant Mcp Hive only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.

Monitor for security advisories

Subscribe to Mcp Hive's security advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.

Document usage policies

Create and maintain a clear policy for how Mcp Hive is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.

Situations That Warrant Independent Review of Mcp Hive

Nerq's signals are one input. In the following situations, evaluate Mcp Hive's measured signals against your own requirements before making a decision:

For each situation, compare Mcp Hive's measured trust score of 72.8/100 and its individual signals against your organization's own criteria. Nerq does not assert whether Mcp Hive is suitable for any particular use.

How Mcp Hive Compares to Industry Standards

Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among uncategorized tools, the average Trust Score is 62/100. Mcp Hive's score of 72.8/100 is significantly above the category average of 62/100.

This places Mcp Hive in the top tier of uncategorized tools that Nerq tracks. Tools scoring this far above average typically demonstrate mature security practices, consistent release cadence, and broad community adoption.

Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks moderate in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.

Trust Score History

Nerq continuously monitors Mcp Hive and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or maintenance patterns change, Mcp Hive's score is updated within 24 hours.

Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to security and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced maintenance, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Mcp Hive's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=mcp-hive&include=history

Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — security, maintenance, documentation, compliance, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Mcp Hive are strengthening or weakening over time.

Key Takeaways

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Mcp Hive Safe?
mcp-hive with a Nerq Trust Score of 72.8/100 (B). Strongest signal: compliance (80/100). Score based on Security (0/100), Maintenance (0/100), Popularity (0/100), Documentation (0/100).
What is Mcp Hive's trust score?
mcp-hive: 72.8/100 (B). Score based on Security (0/100), Maintenance (0/100), Popularity (0/100), Documentation (0/100). Compliance: 80/100. Scores update as new data becomes available. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=mcp-hive
What are safer alternatives to Mcp Hive?
In the Uncategorized category, more software tools are being analyzed — check back soon. mcp-hive scores 72.8/100.
How often is Mcp Hive's safety score updated?
Nerq recomputes Mcp Hive's trust score as new data becomes available. Current: 72.8/100 (B). API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=mcp-hive
Can I use Mcp Hive in a regulated environment?
Mcp Hive: 72.8/100 (B). Compliance: 41 of 52 jurisdictions. Evaluate against your own regulatory requirements.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

See Also

Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated measurements based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements, verdicts, or guarantees of suitability. Always evaluate the signals against your own requirements.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy