mcp-server-chart vs node-newrelic — Trust Score Comparison

Side-by-side trust comparison of mcp-server-chart and node-newrelic. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

mcp-server-chart scores 59.2/100 (D) while node-newrelic scores 76.5/100 (B) on the Nerq Trust Score. node-newrelic leads by 17.3 points. mcp-server-chart is a infrastructure tool with 3,637 stars. node-newrelic is a uncategorized tool with 997 stars, Nerq Verified.
59.2
D
Categoryinfrastructure
Stars3,637
Sourcemcp
Security0
Compliance100
Maintenance0
Documentation0
vs
76.5
B verified
Categoryuncategorized
Stars997
Sourcegithub
Security0
Compliance100
Maintenance0
Documentation0

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric mcp-server-chart node-newrelic
Trust Score59.2/10076.5/100
GradeDB
Stars3,637997
Categoryinfrastructureuncategorized
Security00
Compliance100100
Maintenance00
Documentation00
EU AI Act RiskminimalN/A
VerifiedNoYes

Verdict

node-newrelic leads with a trust score of 76.5/100 compared to mcp-server-chart's 59.2/100 (a 17.3-point difference). However, mcp-server-chart has stronger community adoption (3,637 vs 997 stars). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

mcp-server-chart leads on security with a score of 0/100 compared to node-newrelic's 0/100. This score reflects dependency vulnerability analysis, known CVE exposure, and security best practices. A higher security score means fewer known vulnerabilities and better security hygiene in the codebase.

Maintenance & Activity

mcp-server-chart demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (0/100 vs 0/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.

Documentation

mcp-server-chart has better documentation (0/100 vs 0/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.

Community & Adoption

mcp-server-chart has 3,637 GitHub stars while node-newrelic has 997. mcp-server-chart has significantly broader community adoption, which typically means more Stack Overflow answers, more third-party tutorials, and faster ecosystem development.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose mcp-server-chart if you need:

  • Larger community (3,637 vs 997 stars)

Choose node-newrelic if you need:

  • Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use

Switching from mcp-server-chart to node-newrelic (or vice versa)

When migrating between mcp-server-chart and node-newrelic, consider these factors:

  1. API Compatibility: mcp-server-chart (infrastructure) and node-newrelic (uncategorized) serve different categories, so migration may require significant refactoring.
  2. Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the mcp-server-chart safety report and node-newrelic safety report for known issues.
  3. Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
  4. Community Support: mcp-server-chart has 3,637 stars and node-newrelic has 997. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
mcp-server-chart Safety Report node-newrelic Safety Report mcp-server-chart Alternatives node-newrelic Alternatives

Related Pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, mcp-server-chart or node-newrelic?
Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, mcp-server-chart has a trust score of 59.2/100 (D) while node-newrelic scores 76.5/100 (B). The 17.3-point difference suggests node-newrelic has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.
How do mcp-server-chart and node-newrelic compare on security?
mcp-server-chart has a security score of 0/100 and node-newrelic scores 0/100. Both have comparable security profiles. mcp-server-chart's compliance score is 100/100 (EU risk: minimal), while node-newrelic's is 100/100 (EU risk: N/A).
Should I use mcp-server-chart or node-newrelic?
The choice depends on your requirements. mcp-server-chart (infrastructure, 3,637 stars) and node-newrelic (uncategorized, 997 stars) serve different use cases. On trust, mcp-server-chart scores 59.2/100 and node-newrelic scores 76.5/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (0 vs 0), and maintenance activity (0 vs 0).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-09-21 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy